Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The purpose of this study was to compare the composite and individual relationships for mechanomyographic (MMG) amplitude vs. torque during incremental isometric muscle actions. Ten women and six men (mean age +/- SD = 21.8 +/- 1.6 y) performed isometric leg extension muscle actions at 10-100% of peak isometric torque. Accelerometers were placed over the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles to detect the MMG signals. Polynomial regression analyses were used to determine the composite and individual patterns for MMG amplitude vs. isometric torque. The results indicated that the composite MMG amplitude vs. isometric torque relationships for all subjects combined were quadratic for the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis, and linear for the rectus femoris. The results of the individual analyses for the vastus lateralis revealed that the best fit model was linear for six subjects, quadratic for five subjects, cubic for three subjects, while two subjects exhibited no significant relationship. For the rectus femoris, eight subjects demonstrated linear patterns, six were quadratic, and two were cubic. For the vastus medialis, six subjects demonstrated linear patterns, four were quadratic, four were cubic, and two demonstrated no significant relationship. Examination of the patterns between muscles for each individual subject demonstrated that twelve of the sixteen subjects demonstrated different patterns for MMG amplitude vs. isometric torque for at least two of the three muscles examined. The results indicated there were differences in the patterns of responses for the composite MMG amplitude vs. isometric torque relationships for the three muscles. Furthermore, individual patterns for MMG amplitude frequently differed from the composite patterns, as well as between muscles. The results suggested that, in addition to using composite results of MMG responses, individual subject responses should be examined. Furthermore, caution should be used in generalizing the MMG responses of the quadriceps femoris muscles when examining a single muscle.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!