Aim: The aim of this work was to present a comparison of screw-retained and cemented-retained implant prostheses based on a retrospective analysis of 1 939 dental implants. The advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of those two different types of dental restorations are discussed and compared with the recent international literature. It is important to underline the influence of the attachment mechanism on many clinical aspects of implant dentistry.
Methods: A group of 527 patients was analyzed. All of the patients required implant rehabilitation. 1 939 dental implants were positioned between January 1997 and December 2003.
Results: The analyzed clinical trials show the presence of several factors essential to the long-term success of any implant prosthesis. Aesthetic, retrievability, passivity of framework, occlusion, ease of fabrication and cost and retention. In this study, 762 cemented dental prostheses were used for 1 551 dental implants placed. The survival rate of this rehabilitation was 98.4 % with an average of 34.7 month follow-up; 84 screwed-dental prostheses were placed on 330 dental implants. The success percentage of this type of prostheses was 100% with an average of 44.3 month follow-up.
Conclusion: Cemented-implant prosthesis and screw-retained implant prosthesis analyzed in this investigation, present with advantages and disadvantages. Clinicians should be aware of the limitations and disadvantages of each type of prosthesis, so as to select the one that is most appropriate for a given clinical situation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res
January 2025
Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Objective: The orthodontic mini-implant (OMI) failure often occurs due to the accumulation of peri-implantitis bacteria surrounding it, which results in a stable, resistant form of absolute skeletal anchorage during orthodontic treatment. Administering doxycycline may be the solution, but long-term side effects result in antibiotic resistance. Roselle flowers (Hibiscus sabdariffa) possess beneficial active phytochemical substances, which may have potential as an OMI peri-implantitis alternative therapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Dent Res
January 2025
MICORALIS, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Periodontitis, a prevalent and costly oral disease, remains incompletely understood in its etiopathogenesis. The conventional model attributes it to pathogenic bacteria, but emerging evidence suggests dysbiosis involving bacteria, herpesviruses, and an exaggerated host immune response. Among herpesviruses, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) closely links to severe periodontitis, yet the mechanisms underlying EBV-related pathogenesis remain elusive.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Implant Dent Relat Res
February 2025
Department of Dental Medicine, Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the salivary profile of inflammatory mediators in individuals with periodontal and peri-implant disease as compared to individuals with periodontal and peri-implant health.
Materials And Methods: Saliva samples were collected from 155 participants (mean age 63.3 ± 11.
Eur J Dent Educ
January 2025
Department of Prosthodontics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, New York, USA.
Introduction: Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) serve as a reliable assessment tool for clinical and competency evaluation. Traditional OSCEs, involving live patients, present logistical challenges and evoke student anxiety. In an effort to create a comprehensive clinical series of examinations, electronic OSCEs (e-OSCEs) were developed for assessing clinical competencies in prosthodontics at a large dental school.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Implant Dent Relat Res
February 2025
Unit of Basic Oral Investigation-UIBO, School of Dentistry, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Background: This cross-sectional study aimed to compare the composition of the submucosal microbiome of peri-implantitis with paired and unpaired healthy implant samples.
Methods: We evaluated submucosal plaque samples obtained in 39 cases, including 13 cases of peri-implantitis, 13 cases involving healthy implants from the same patient (paired samples), and 13 cases involving healthy implants from different individuals (unpaired samples). The patients were evaluated using next-generation genomic sequencing (Illumina) based on 16S rRNA gene amplification.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!