AI Article Synopsis
- The study compares the effectiveness of full-endoscopic and microsurgical techniques for treating lumbar disc herniations in 178 patients over a two-year follow-up.
- Both techniques showed similar clinical outcomes, with 82% of patients experiencing relief from leg pain and a recurrence rate of 6.2% for both methods.
- However, the full-endoscopic technique demonstrated significant benefits, including less back pain, shorter rehabilitation times, fewer complications, and reduced trauma during surgery.
Article Abstract
Study Design: Prospective, randomized, controlled study of patients with lumbar disc herniations, operated either in a full-endoscopic or microsurgical technique.
Objective: Comparison of results of lumbar discectomies in full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal technique with the conventional microsurgical technique.
Summary Of Background Data: Even with good results, conventional disc operations may result in subsequent damage due to trauma. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer intraoperatively and after surgery. With the transforaminal and interlaminar techniques, 2 full-endoscopic procedures are available for lumbar disc operations.
Methods: One hundred seventy-eight patients with full-endoscopic or microsurgical discectomy underwent follow-up for 2 years. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: VAS, German version North American Spine Society Instrument, Oswestry Low-Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.
Results: After surgery 82% of the patients no longer had leg pain, and 14% had occasional pain. The clinical results were the same in both groups. The recurrence rate was 6.2% with no difference between the groups. The full-endoscopic techniques brought significant advantages in the following areas: back pain, rehabilitation, complications, and traumatization.
Conclusion: The clinical results of the full-endoscopic technique are equal to those of the microsurgical technique. At the same time, there are advantages in the operation technique and reduced traumatization. With the surgical devices and the possibility of selecting an interlaminar or posterolateral to lateral transforaminal procedure, lumbar disc herniations outside and inside the spinal canal can be sufficiently removed using the full-endoscopic technique, when taking the appropriate criteria into account. Full-endoscopic surgery is a sufficient and safe supplementation and alternative to microsurgical procedures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of different oblique lumbar interbody fusions for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
Neurosurg Rev
January 2025
Nanjing TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 157 Daming Road, Nanjing, Qinhuai District, 210022, China.
To systematically evaluate the differences in the clinical efficacy of lumbar degenerative disorders (LDDs) treatment between oblique lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF), OLIF stand-alone (OLIF-SA), and OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF). A systematic search was conducted on both English and Chinese databases, wherein the literature was screened based on title, abstract, and full text. Literature that met the inclusion criteria was assessed for quality and relevant information was extracted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: To compare the effect of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approaches in fusing the L4-L5 segment and predicting the potential risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).
Methods: A computed tomography scan image was processed and the three-dimensional model of the L1-L5 spine was reconstructed. The minimally invasive and Open TLIF finite element models were constructed.
Clinical and radiological outcomes of lumbar endoscopic decompression for treating lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a retrospective study at mean 4.4 years follow-up.
Front Surg
January 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Purpose: To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of lumbar endoscopic decompression for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with concurrent degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).
Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with LSS and DLS who underwent lumbar endoscopic decompression between 2016 and 2021. The average follow-up duration was 52.
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of X. Luo, et al. concerning "A new hernia blocking system to prevent recurrent lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, intraoperative findings and six-months post-operative outcomes" by O. Godino et al. (Eur Spine J [2024]: doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024- 08595-x).
Eur Spine J
January 2025
Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Deep Learning for Lumbar Disc Herniation Diagnosis and Treatment Decision Making Using MRI Images: A Retrospective Study.
World Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University.
Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common cause of back and leg pain. Diagnosis relies on clinical history, physical exam, and imaging, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) being an important reference standard. While artificial intelligence (AI) has been explored for MRI image recognition in LDH, existing methods often focus solely on disc herniation presence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!