A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Interstudy reproducibility of SSFP cine magnetic resonance: impact of magnetic field strength and parallel imaging. | LitMetric

Interstudy reproducibility of SSFP cine magnetic resonance: impact of magnetic field strength and parallel imaging.

J Magn Reson Imaging

Department of Radiology, Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-8896, USA.

Published: May 2008

Purpose: To study the effects of field strength and parallel imaging on image contrast and interstudy reproducibility of right and left ventricular (RV and LV) measurements using steady-state free precession (SSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).

Materials And Methods: Thirty-two subjects (20 normal, 12 cardiac patients) underwent four SSFP cine short-axis imaging studies: two at 1.5T, one at 3T, and another at 3T with parallel imaging (SENSE). RV and LV contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were compared between methods. Interstudy reproducibility of RV and LV measurements were assessed by Bland-Altman analyses.

Results: 3T SENSE imaging reduced total imaging time from 8 +/- 2 minutes to 3 +/- 1 minute (P < 0.001). A significant gain in LV CNR was detected between 1.5T and 3T with SENSE (43.8 +/- 6.5 vs. 48.4 +/- 7.4, P = 0.01), but no significant gain was detected in RV CNR. The reproducibility of LV and RV measurements between two 1.5T studies was not significantly different from the reproducibility between a 1.5T study and a 3T study with SENSE.

Conclusion: SENSE imaging at 3T is a reproducible technique for assessing RV and LV structure and function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21343DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interstudy reproducibility
12
parallel imaging
12
ssfp cine
8
magnetic resonance
8
field strength
8
strength parallel
8
reproducibility measurements
8
sense imaging
8
imaging
7
reproducibility ssfp
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!