Objective: To assess the completeness of cardiac risk factor documentation by cardiologists, and agreement with patient report.

Study Design And Setting: A total of 68 Ontario cardiologists and 789 of their ambulatory cardiology patients were randomly selected. Cardiac risk factor data were systematically extracted from medical charts, and a survey was mailed to participants to assess risk factor concordance.

Results: With regard to completeness of risk factor documentation, 90.4% of charts contained a report of hypertension, 87.2% of diabetes, 80.5% of dyslipidemia, 78.6% of smoking behavior, 73.0% of other comorbidities, 48.7% of family history of heart disease, and 45.9% of body mass index or obesity. Using Cohen's k, there was a concordance of 87.7% between physician charts and patient self-report of diabetes, 69.5% for obesity, 56.8% for smoking status, 49% for hypertension, and 48.4% for family history.

Conclusion: Two of four major cardiac risk factors (hypertension and diabetes) were recorded in 90% of patient records; however, arguably the most important reversible risk factors for cardiac disease (dyslipidemia and smoking) were only reported 80% of the time. The results suggest that physician chart report may not be the criterion standard for quality assessment in cardiac risk factor reporting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2924367PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk factor
24
cardiac risk
16
risk
8
factor documentation
8
risk factors
8
factor
6
cardiac
5
cardiologists' charting
4
charting varied
4
varied risk
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!