To inform the design of haptic information displays for noisy environments, we investigated two mechanisms for temporal masking of vibrotactile stimuli (backwards and common-onset) using a commodity display. We used a two-channel setup, presenting stimuli to the middle and ring finger of a participant's right hand. The stimuli consisted of 250 Hz sinusoidal waveforms displayed at a fixed amplitude in various combinations of duration (0, 30 or 300 ms) and stimulus onset asynchrony (0 or 30 ms). In anticipation of future embedded applications where signals are deliberately masked but levels cannot be individualized, signals were standardized at conservative (harder to mask) levels. Our results confirm the existence of a statistically significant masking effect for both forms of haptic masking explored, with common-onset exhibiting a significantly larger masking effect than backwards. However, an analysis of confidence in response levels shows no difference between the two successful masking techniques. We discuss mechanisms that could be responsible for these results, which have implications for the design of user interfaces that rely on tactile transmission of information.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.018 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Upper Body Thermal Referral and Tactile Masking for Localized Feedback.
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph
February 2023
This paper investigates the effects of thermal referral and tactile masking illusions to achieve localized thermal feedback on the upper body. Two experiments are conducted. The first experiment uses a 2D array of sixteen vibrotactile actuators (4 × 4) with four thermal actuators to explore the thermal distribution on the user's back.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffects of training and using an audio-tactile sensory substitution device on speech-in-noise understanding.
Sci Rep
February 2022
The Baruch Ivcher Institute for Brain, Cognition & Technology, The Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology and the Ruth and Meir Rosental Brain Imaging Center, Reichman University, Herzliya, Israel.
Understanding speech in background noise is challenging. Wearing face-masks, imposed by the COVID19-pandemics, makes it even harder. We developed a multi-sensory setup, including a sensory substitution device (SSD) that can deliver speech simultaneously through audition and as vibrations on the fingertips.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHome-Use Evaluation of a Wearable Collision Warning Device for Individuals With Severe Vision Impairments: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Ophthalmol
September 2021
Schepens Eye Research Institute of Mass Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: There is scant rigorous evidence about the real-world mobility benefit of electronic mobility aids.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of a collision warning device on the number of contacts experienced by blind and visually impaired people in their daily mobility.
Design, Setting, And Participants: In this double-masked randomized clinical trial, participants used a collision warning device during their daily mobility over a period of 4 weeks.
Spontaneous activity competes with externally evoked responses in sensory cortex.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
June 2021
Optophysiology Lab, Institute of Biology III, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany;
The interaction between spontaneous and externally evoked neuronal activity is fundamental for a functional brain. Increasing evidence suggests that bursts of high-power oscillations in the 15- to 30-Hz beta-band represent activation of internally generated events and mask perception of external cues. Yet demonstration of the effect of beta-power modulation on perception in real time is missing, and little is known about the underlying mechanism.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe effects of vibrotactile masking on heartbeat detection: Evidence that somatosensory mechanoreceptors transduce heartbeat sensations.
Psychophysiology
June 2021
Department of Psychology, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
The ability to detect heartbeat sensations is the most common basis for inferring individual differences in sensitivity to the interoceptive stimuli generated by the visceral activity. While the sensory sources of heartbeat sensations have yet to be identified, there is a growing consensus that visceral sensation, in general, is supported not only by the interoceptive system but also by the somatosensory system, and even by exteroception. The current experiment sought evidence on this issue by exploring the effects of masking the functions of somatosensory Pacinian and non-Pacinian mechanoreceptors on the ability to detect heartbeat sensations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!