The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) exert a wide range of neurochemical and therapeutic activities. To investigate the neural effectors of SSRIs, we measured the regional cerebral metabolic rates for glucose (rCMRglc) in 56 brain regions of Fischer-344 rats 30 min after intraperitoneal injection of 0.4, 4 or 40 mg/kg of fluoxetine or fluvoxamine or after 4 mg/kg of paroxetine or sertraline. Both shared and drug-specific effects were detected. While all four SSRIs similarly reduced rCMRglc in a network of subcortical brain regions including the amygdala, locus coeruleus, basal ganglia and hypothalamic paraventricular nuclei, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline reduced rCMRglc also in the hippocampus and sertraline in the lateral habenula. The topography and the relation to dose of rCMRglc reductions by SSRIs differ from those of other classes of antidepressants, thus suggesting that SSRIs may specifically modulate brain areas involved in the physiological responses to stress.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

paroxetine sertraline
12
cerebral metabolic
8
fluoxetine fluvoxamine
8
fluvoxamine paroxetine
8
brain regions
8
reduced rcmrglc
8
metabolic effects
4
effects fluoxetine
4
sertraline
4
sertraline conscious
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: This study investigates the potential association between commonly prescribed psychotropic medications, such as Atypical Antipsychotics (AAs), Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs), and Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), and congenital anomalies in newborns. The analysis uses data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: Spontaneously reported cases of congenital anomalies in newborns (under 28 days old) were extracted from the FAERS database, covering January 2004 to June 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) remain among the most prevalent diseases and the most significant challenges faced by medicine in the 21st century. The frequent co-occurrence and bidirectional relationship between the two conditions necessitates the identification of treatment strategies that benefit both. The purpose of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze data on the efficacy and safety of agomelatine (AGO) in the treatment of patients with depression with comorbid diabetes to explore its potential mechanism of action in both diseases and its impact on diabetic parameters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Adverse cutaneous drug reactions have been reported with most drugs, including antidepressants (ADs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). The lack of extensive research on the relationship between ADs and SGAs, and cutaneous toxicity remains troubling. Our study aimed to assess the cutaneous toxicity of ADs and SGAs and provide valuable insights for clinical applications and scientific investigations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Can fluoxetine influence orthodontic tooth movement? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on animal models.

Int Orthod

December 2024

Department of Periodontics and Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, United States.

Introduction: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluoxetine adversely affect bone mineral density (BMD) and turnover, thereby increasing the risk of fractures. The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate studies on animal models that assessed whether fluoxetine can influence orthodontic tooth movement (OTM).

Material And Methods: Indexed databases (PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and ISI Web of Knowledge) and Google Scholar were searched without time and language barriers up to and including June 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Increasingly, pharmacogenetic testing helps providers with medication selection based upon patient-specific DNA results. While several government-funded organizations work towards consensus and standardization for testing and interpretation, compliance to these best practices remains inconsistent. Pharmacogenetic testing companies often develop proprietary practices for interpreting and reporting, which can lead to incongruency of reported results among companies and potential discrepancies in interpretation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!