Objectives: To compare iomeprol 400 and iodixanol 320 in pulmonary artery MDCTA in subjects with suspected pulmonary embolism.

Methods: Eighty randomized subjects received equi-iodine intravenous doses (48 g) of iomeprol 400 (n=40) or iodixanol 320 (n=40), via power injector at 4 mL/s. Four-row (35 subjects) and 64-row (45 subjects) scanners were used. Lumen attenuation was determined on-site and by two off-site blinded readers in the main, lobar, segmental and subsegmental pulmonary arteries. Statistical comparison between groups was performed for demographics and lumen attenuation.

Results: There were no between-group differences (p>0.05) in demographics. Pulmonary artery attenuation was significantly (p
Conclusion: The greater iodine delivery rate achievable with iomeprol 400 compared to iodixanol-320 at equi-iodine dose and injection rate permits consistently greater attenuation at all levels of the pulmonary arterial tree.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.058DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iomeprol 400
12
iodixanol 320
12
doses iomeprol
8
pulmonary artery
8
pulmonary
5
mdct angiography
4
angiography detection
4
detection pulmonary
4
pulmonary emboli
4
emboli comparison
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!