In a classic paper that may be regarded as the starting point of polarization optics, G. G. Stokes [Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc.9, 399 (1852)] presented a theorem according to which any light beam is equivalent to the sum of two light beams, one of which is completely polarized and the other completely unpolarized. We show that Stokes' proof of this theorem is flawed. We present a condition for the theorem to be valid.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ol.33.000642 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
light beam
8
completely polarized
8
polarized completely
8
completely unpolarized
8
beam considered
4
considered sum
4
completely
4
sum completely
4
unpolarized beam?
4
beam? classic
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!