Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
As increasing numbers of children with congenital heart disorders reach adulthood, the family physician, cardiologist, and obstetrician will increasingly be called upon to give advice regarding the safety of pregnancy. This need has been further highlighted by the recognition that maternal mortality associated with cardiac disease is rising. Unfortunately, this field of practice remains relatively "evidence-sparse" with many management decisions being guided by anecdote and "best guess" common sense. Not surprisingly, this results in many fundamental controversies over the optimal care these patients should receive. This article highlights, through the use of case histories, some of these contentious areas, reflecting the different manifestations of congenital maternal cardiac disease and highlighting the limitations of our knowledge.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0803.2006.00005.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!