Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The response of extrinsic photoconductors to a step change in incident photon flux has long been known to exhibit a sharp transient feature, particularly at higher signal levels, known as the hook effect. We demonstrate experimentally and theoretically that the hook effect can be due to reduced illumination adjacent to the injecting contact. This nonuniformity can be produced by the transverse illumination of the detector that is common for far-infrared Ge:Ga devices. The hook effect has been demonstrated to be either present or absent in the same Ge:Ga photoconductor, at comparable signal size, depending on the nature of the contact illumination. Numerical finite-difference calculations of the transient response support this explanation and produce features that replicate the experimental results.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.40.005748 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!