In a critique of two-wavelength lidar inversion techniques, Kunz [Appl. Opt. 38, 1015 (1999)] presented mathematical arguments that such techniques cannot yield unique solutions for extinction profiles. Ackermann [Appl. Opt. 38, 7414 (1999)] presented an analytical solution for the extinction profile from a two-wavelength lidar and also attempted to refute Kunz's mathematical arguments. However, the fundamental reasons why the authors of these two papers reached different conclusions were not fully uncovered. These previous papers are critically examined, and a new mathematical proof of uniqueness is provided. Further analyses are presented to explain how the technique works, along with comments on its limitations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.40.002004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

two-wavelength lidar
12
lidar inversion
8
inversion techniques
8
[appl opt
8
1999] presented
8
mathematical arguments
8
comment two-wavelength
4
techniques critique
4
critique two-wavelength
4
techniques kunz
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!