Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This paper reports a series of comparative tests in vitro, that examined how meniscectomy and meniscal allografting affected tibio-femoral joint contact pressure. Knees were loaded in axial compression and pressure maps obtained from the lateral compartment using Fuji Prescale film inserted below the meniscus. This was repeated after meniscectomy, and then after meniscal allografting with fixation by a bone plug for the insertional ligaments, plus sutures. Finally, the pressure, when the allograft was secured by sutures alone, was measured. The peak pressure rose significantly after meniscectomy, and then was reduced significantly by both allograft methods so that it was not significantly different to normal. Allografts fixed by sutures only allowed slightly higher contact pressure than when they had bone fixation. This study suggests that meniscal allografting should have a chondroprotective effect and that there is a small advantage from adding bony fixation to suture fixation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0503-4 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!