Screening tests are not enough to detect hemineglect.

Arq Neuropsiquiatr

Setor Neurologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Published: December 2007

Objective: To verify the sensitivity of the conventional subtests of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT) in the diagnosis of hemineglect after stroke.

Method: One hundred and two patients with cerebral infarct or hemorrhage were prospectively evaluated. In 22, hemineglect was diagnosed using standard BIT criteria. The frequency of hemineglect using 6 commonly used screening subtests of this battery was assessed.

Results: Hemineglect would not be recognized in 10 patients if they were only screened using the line crossing test; this would be the case in 2 patients with the letter cancellation test; and in 4 patient with the line bisection test. Three patients would not be diagnosed even if both line crossing and line bisection tests were used.

Conclusion: Hemineglect may not be recognized with single screening tests commonly used. The use of a standard battery is recommended to improve diagnostic sensitivity in individuals with various subtypes of hemineglect.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2007000700019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

screening tests
8
hemineglect recognized
8
hemineglect
7
tests detect
4
detect hemineglect
4
hemineglect objective
4
objective verify
4
verify sensitivity
4
sensitivity conventional
4
conventional subtests
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!