Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Bubble disruption is associated with the response of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) exposed to high acoustic pressures. This behavior is important for bubble detection techniques as well as flow quantitation and some proposed therapeutic applications. Previous work has measured acoustically the disruption threshold and postdisruption echo from populations of microbubbles. This suggests a model for UCA disruption whereby ultrasound breaks their shell, leaving free gas bubbles. Diffusion of gas causes the bubbles to shrink and, consequently, reduces the measured backscatter echo over time. In this work, similar bubbles containing three different gases were measured and their echo behavior with time compared with a simple simulation based on diffusion of gas out of the bubble. It was found that, in general, the simulations and experiments compared well at low disruption pressures. Incorporating bubble fragmentation in the simulation model brought its results closer to experiment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.12.016 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!