The World Health Organization defines hormone replacement therapy as carcinogenic: is this plausible?

Gynecol Endocrinol

Department of Endocrinology and Menopause, University Women's Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany.

Published: March 2008

In June 2005 the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified combined hormone contraception and menopausal therapy as carcinogenic in humans. The IARC's function is to identify potential carcinogens associated with nutrition, environment and pharmaceutical products. They do not produce risk-benefit analyses for any country or population. Their conclusions are highly controversial in that no proof is presented for a causal relationship of estrogens with reproductive cancer, be it plausibility according to mechanisms of action or experimental evidence in an animal model. Equating natural compounds like estradiol with defined carcinogens like asbestos, tobacco smoke as well as indispensable drugs such as aspirin and tamoxifen is of no substantial clinical relevance. Thus, there are no new reasons to change current management principles with combination hormone contraception and therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09513590801893349DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

therapy carcinogenic
8
hormone contraception
8
health organization
4
organization defines
4
defines hormone
4
hormone replacement
4
replacement therapy
4
carcinogenic plausible?
4
plausible? june
4
june 2005
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!