A pilot study on combination of cryosurgery and (125)iodine seed implantation for treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

World J Gastroenterol

Cryosurgery Center for Cancer, Fuda Cancer Hospital Guangzhou, No 167, West Xingang Road, Guangzhou 510300, Guangdong Province, China.

Published: March 2008

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining cryosurgery with (125) iodine seed implantation for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer in 49 patients.
  • The treatment involved either intraoperative or percutaneous cryosurgery, followed by (125) iodine seed implantation, with some patients also receiving regional chemotherapy.
  • Results showed significant tumor necrosis in most patients, with complete response in 20.4%, partial response in 38.8%, and a median survival of 16.2 months, indicating a promising therapeutic approach without therapy-related mortality.

Article Abstract

Aim: To study the therapeutic value of combination of cryosurgery and (125)iodine seed implantation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Forty-nine patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (males 36, females 13), with a median age of 59 years, were enrolled in the study. Twelve patients had liver metastases. In all cases the tumors were considered unresectable after a comprehensive evaluation. Patients were treated with cryosurgery, which was performed intraoperatively or percutaneously under guidance of ultrasound and/or computed tomography (CT), and (125)iodine seed implantation, which was performed during cryosurgery or post-cryosurgery under guidance of ultrasound and/or CT. A few patients received regional celiac artery chemotherapy.

Results: Thirteen patients received intraoperative cryosurgery and 36 received percutaneous cryosurgery. Some patients underwent repeat cryosurgery. (125)Iodine seed implantation was performed during freezing procedure in 35 patients and 3-9 d after cryosurgery in 14 cases. Twenty patients, 10 of whom had hepatic metastases received regional chemotherapy. At 3 mo after therapy, CT was repeated to estimate tumor response to therapy. Most patients showed varying degrees of tumor necrosis. Complete response (CR) of tumor was seen in 20.4% patients, partial response (PR), in 38.8%, stable disease (SD), in 30.6%, and progressive disease (PD), in 10.2%. Adverse effects associated with cryosurgery included upper abdomen pain and increased serum amylase. Acute pancreatitis was seen in 6 patients one of whom developed severe pancreatitis. All adverse effects were controlled by medical management with no poor outcome. There was no therapy-related mortality. During a median follow-up of 18 mo (range of 5-40), the median survival was 16.2 mo, with 26 patients (53.1%) surviving for 12 mo or more. Overall, the 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-mo survival rates were 94.9%, 63.1%, 22.8% and 9.5%, respectively. Eight patients had survival of 24 mo or more. The patient with the longest survival (40 mo) is still living without evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion: Cryosurgery, which is far less invasive than conventional pancreatic resection, and is associated with a low rate of adverse effects, should be the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. (125)Iodine seed implantation can destroy the residual surviving cancer cells after cryosurgery. Hence, a combination of both modalities has a complementary effect.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2693760PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.14.1603DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

125iodine seed
20
seed implantation
20
locally advanced
16
advanced pancreatic
16
patients
14
cryosurgery 125iodine
12
pancreatic cancer
12
adverse effects
12
cryosurgery
11
combination cryosurgery
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!