A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[The role of positron emission tomography (PET) in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Mediastinal lymph node metastasis (MLNM) is a key prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment for patients without distant metastasis.
  • A study compared the effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) and mediastinoscopy in staging NSCLC, involving 100 operable patients.
  • Results showed PET had lower sensitivity and accuracy rates (74% and 76%) compared to mediastinoscopy (83% and 95%), confirming that mediastinoscopy remains the gold standard for evaluating mediastinal staging in NSCLC.

Article Abstract

Mediastinal lymph node metastasis (MLNM) is the most important prognostic factor and guide to the treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with no distant metastasis. As a non invasive method, using of positron emission tomography (PET) to evaluate NSCLC is increasing. We aimed to compare results of PET and mediastinoscopy to reveal effectiveness of PET in the mediastinal staging of NSCLC patients. PET was performed to 100 operable NSCLC patients between 2004 and 2006. Later, standard cervical mediastinoscopy was performed to all of the patients. Twenty-six patients who detected MLNM at mediastinoscopy were referred to oncology clinic for neoadjuvant or definitive chemo-radiotherapy. Other 74 patients underwent thoracotomy and performed lung resection and mediastinal lymphatic dissection. Sensitivity and specificity rates for detecting mediastinal lymphatic metastasis of PET and mediastinoscopy were compared. There were 89 male and 11 female with mean age of 59 years. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rates were calculated as 74%, 76%, 59%, 86% and 76% respectively for PET and 83%, 100%, 100%, 93% and 95% respectively for mediastinoscopy. Accuracy rate of PET is not sufficient and mediastinoscopy is still the gold standard to evaluate mediastinal staging of NSCLC, at present.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mediastinal staging
12
nsclc patients
12
positron emission
8
emission tomography
8
pet
8
tomography pet
8
pet mediastinal
8
non-small cell
8
cell lung
8
pet mediastinoscopy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!