Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Few studies have compared Cavit thickness and access design as factors in microbial leakage. The present study used an acrylic tooth model to measure leakage of Streptococcus mutans. Pilot studies confirming the sterility of Cavit showed it will inhibit microbial growth for 2 days. The experiments compared class I preparations where Cavit thickness was 4 mm with class II preparations where thickness was 2-3 mm. Accesses sealed with cotton pellets were compared with those without cotton. Results of the study showed no bacterial contamination in any of the class I samples (up to 14 days). Some class II samples showed contamination at day 1 (3 out of 14), with all contaminated at day 7 (14 of 14), yet only 1 contaminated at day 14 (1 out of 14). The results suggest that a 4-mm thickness of Cavit should prevent bacterial ingress for at least 2 weeks, but microbial leakage may occur if temporary thickness is less than 3 mm or in a complex access preparation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.10.014 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!