A set of low-risk gambling limits were recently produced using Canadian epidemiological data on the intensity of gambling behavior and related consequences (Currie et al. Addiction 101:570-580, 2006). The empirically derived limits (gambling no more than two to three times per month, spending no more than $501-$100o CAN per year or no more than 1% of gross income spent on gambling) accurately predicted risk of gambling-related harm after controlling for other risk factors. The present study sought to replicate these limits on data collected in three independently conducted Canadian provincial gambling surveys. Dose-response curves and logistic regression analyses were applied to gambling prevalence data collected in surveys conducted in 2001-2002 within the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, and Ontario (combined sample N = 7,675). A comparable dose-response relationship between gambling intensity and risk of harm was found in each province. The optimal thresholds for defining an upper limit of low-risk gambling were similar across the three provinces despite variations in the availability and organization of legalized gambling opportunities within each region. These results provide additional evidence supporting the validity of the low-risk gambling limits. Quantitative limits could be used to augment existing responsible gambling guidelines.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9091-y | DOI Listing |
Addict Behav
December 2024
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia. Electronic address:
Background: Relationships between gambling motives and problem gambling have been identified in previous research. There is, however, evidence of moderate-to-high heterogeneity in these associations, suggesting that further research is required to elucidate which gamblers are more susceptible to the influence of different types of motives. This study aims to (1) explore the relationship between gambling motives (Gambling Motives Questionnaire-Financial coping, enhancement, social, financial) and problem gambling (Problem Gambling Severity Index); and (2) investigate the degree to which psychological variables implicated by the pathways model (positive reinforcement high-risk situations, negative reinforcement high-risk situations, psychological distress, emotional dysregulation, distress intolerance and impulsivity) moderate these relationships.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Clin Pharmacol
December 2024
School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, Canada.
Aims: Sex and gender may influence penicillin allergy label (PAL) prevalence and outcomes. This review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of direct delabelling (DD) and oral challenge (OC) for low-risk patients and examines sex and gender differences in reporting and outcomes.
Methods: We searched PubMed, Database of Abstracts of Reviews and Effects, ClinicalTrials.
J Prev (2022)
November 2024
Addictive Behaviors Research Group (GCA), Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Plaza Feijoo S/N, 33003, Oviedo, Spain.
J Gambl Stud
October 2024
Department of Nursing Management and Education, The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Lifetime gambling activities and behaviors are considered as potentially addictive behaviors that may impact a student's performance. According to a survey conducted in Tanzanian's higher training institutions, for example, 37.2% of sports gamblers were students.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSyst Rev
October 2024
School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, ON, N2G 2C5, Canada.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!