Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Study Design: A prospective randomized controlled study was carried out.
Objective: To determine the effectiveness and safety of a tantalum implant in achieving anterior cervical fusion following 1-level discectomy as treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease with radiculopathy.
Summary Of Background Data: The gold standard for the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease could not be already identified. The morbidity of autologous graft and plating, and the doubt about the mechanical efficacy of plate fixation and the clinical benefits in 1-level fusion have promoted the use of other constructs.
Methods: Sixty-one patients were randomized to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody implant of tantalum (n = 28) or by means of autologous iliac bone graft and plating (n = 33). Fusion rate and segmental height and alignment were blind assessed by radiographs by 2 independent reviewers. Clinical status was evaluated using pain visual analogue scale, the Neck Disability Index, and the Zung Depression Scale. Patient's subjective satisfaction was recorded. Complications and operative parameters were also taken into account.
Results: With an endpoint of 24 months, radiologic and clinical outcomes were similar for both treatments without significant difference. The safety of fusion with tantalum implant was obvious, based on the analysis of complications. Complication rate was considerably higher for the autologous graft plus plating procedure than for implant tantalum (P < 0.005).
Conclusion: The efficacy to achieve fusion after 1-level anterior cervical discectomy, with a good radiologic and clinical outcome, using tantalum implant is equivalent to that of autologous graft and anterior plate, being safer as avoids donor-site graft harvesting and plating complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657f49 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!