Comparative study of four radiofrequency generators for the treatment of snoring.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.

Published: March 2008

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of four radiofrequency generators (Ellman, Select Sutter, Coblator, Somnus) for the treatment of simple snoring.

Materials And Methods: Multicenter, randomized, prospective single-blind study on 120 selected patients with simple snoring (apnea/hypopnea index <10/h of sleep). Snoring sound intensity was measured on a visual analog scale and the partner's short-term satisfaction rate was evaluated after two treatment sessions maximum. Discomfort, pain, and medication intake were compared.

Results: Radiofrequency decreased the snoring sound intensity from 7.9 +/- 1.7 to 4.4 +/- 2.7 (P < 0.0001). The four radiofrequency generators had a statistically comparable efficacy. The Ellman generator caused less discomfort and required less anti-inflammatory drugs.

Conclusion: Despite different technical characteristics, the four generators had a comparable efficacy with good safety. The Ellman generator induced the least discomfort.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2007.11.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiofrequency generators
8
comparative study
4
study radiofrequency
4
generators treatment
4
treatment snoring
4
snoring objective
4
objective compare
4
compare efficacy
4
efficacy safety
4
safety radiofrequency
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!