Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Bladder augmentation using colonic patches is being increasingly performed and a substantial risk of neoplasia in such patches has been reported. We present the case of a 62-year-old man who developed a large flat adenoma in the colonic mucosa of an augmented bladder. The adenoma was indigo-carmine dye sprayed and completely resected via a cystoscope using an endoscopic mucosal resection technique. We discuss how methods used at colonoscopy to detect and remove early neoplastic lesions may readily be employed during colonic patch surveillance at cystoscopy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.005 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!