Background: Reduction mammaplasty is a frequently performed plastic surgical procedure, yet preoperative assessment usually excludes an estimated resection weight. In this retrospective study, a formula was derived using regression analysis of routinely measured preoperative anthropomorphic measurements and intraoperative resection weights.

Methods: Data were collected from 214 consecutive breast reduction patients operated on at a tertiary referral center between January of 1993 and January of 2006. The operations were performed by 15 plastic surgeons using a variety of reduction pattern techniques. Four variables were recorded for each patient: notch to nipple distance, nipple to inframammary crease distance, body mass index, and age. Regression analysis was performed on the data to establish which preoperative measurements correlated most accurately with the resection weight.

Results: The following formula was established relating nipple to inframammary crease distance and notch to nipple distance measurement to the weight removed: Breast weight = (35.4 x notch to nipple distance + 60.66 x nipple to inframammary crease distance) - 1239.64.

Conclusion: Use of this formula aids the surgeon with patient counseling, insurance company quotes, and intraoperatively in patients with asymmetry or those undergoing reconstruction, as a guide to resection weights.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000298319.01574.02DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

notch nipple
12
nipple distance
12
nipple inframammary
12
inframammary crease
12
crease distance
12
resection weights
8
reduction mammaplasty
8
performed plastic
8
regression analysis
8
nipple
6

Similar Publications

Long-term Breast Shape Analysis After Short-scar Reduction Mammaplasty: A Critical View.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

January 2025

From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Background: Over the past 2 decades, vertical scar reduction mammaplasty techniques have been gaining more acceptance. However, many surgeons are still hesitant to use it routinely because of the uncertainty of the effectiveness of vertical scar techniques in managing lower pole skin excess. We aimed to test its efficacy by using objective anthropometric measurements to evaluate long-term breast shape and lower pole stability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Mobile LiDAR technology, using the iPhone's LiDAR scanner, offers an affordable alternative to traditional 3D imaging in plastic surgery, potentially increasing accessibility for surgical planning.
  • In a study involving 25 patients, LiDAR measurements proved highly accurate for most breast measurements and showed excellent inter-rater reliability.
  • The analysis indicated a significant cost reduction of 97.8% compared to conventional 3D systems, with measurement accuracy stabilizing after just a few uses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

 Reduction of very huge breast-gigantic macromastia-is a challenge to breast surgeons in choosing the right procedure to obtain an optimal outcome. The feasibility of a superomedial pedicle (SMP) with some modifications proves to be a good option to achieve a viable nipple areolar complex (NAC) with good size and shape after good resection above 800 g.  Out of the 35 patients with 70 breast reductions, 15 can be considered gigantic macromastia with reductions above 800 g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Successful nipple-areolar complex (NAC) reconstruction greatly influences patient outcomes for transgender patients undergoing chest masculinization. Despite the recent rise in case volume, little is known on designing the ideal NAC that maintains its aesthetics in dynamic settings. This study aimed to examine the characteristics of male NACs and their dimensional variability to help develop guidelines on designing the neo-NAC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is increasingly favored over autologous reconstruction due to its procedural simplicity and recovery benefits. Conducting this reconstruction using either the subpectoral or prepectoral planes has varied aesthetic outcomes. This study utilizes VECTRA XT 3D imaging to objectively assess breast symmetry differences between these surgical techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!