[Value of history and clinical and laboratory data for the diagnosis of dehydration due to acute diarrhea in children younger than 5 years].

Presse Med

Service de pédiatrie générale, urgences et maladies infectieuses, Clinique de pédiatrie et pôle de l'urgence, CHRU de Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.

Published: April 2008

AI Article Synopsis

  • Acute diarrhea in children in France is common and can lead to serious health issues, making the accurate diagnosis of dehydration important for treatment.
  • A review of studies found no single clinical sign or lab result could reliably identify dehydration; instead, a combination of at least three clinical signs is more effective.
  • Current research lacks strong validation for diagnosing dehydration in children, indicating a need for further studies to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Article Abstract

Background: Acute diarrhea is frequent, costly because of the number of hospital admissions required, and sometimes serious, even fatal to children in France. The clinical diagnosis of dehydration is difficult, but essential to determine management.

Objective: To summarize the published data on the value of clinical history, clinical signs and laboratory results for diagnosing dehydration during acute diarrhea in young (1 month-5 years) non-malnourished children.

Methods: Four databases (Medline, INIST, Ovid, and Cochrane) were searched through November 2006, with the key words "dehydration" subcategories "diagnosis, or etiology, or history", "diarrhea" subcategory "diagnosis", and age limits "infant or preschool child". We selected the articles and reviews that included as an endpoint for dehydration "weight gain > 5% after recovery" (the gold standard).

Results: Thirteen studies were selected. No single clinical history item, clinical sign or laboratory value was sufficient to discriminate between children with and without dehydration. The reproducibility of clinical signs varied substantially between studies. Persistent skin folds and signs of vasoconstriction contributed the most information, with good specificity but sensitivity < 50%. The combination of at least 3 clinical signs was most discriminative for dehydration. No dehydration scale has been validated. None of the studies selected had a very high level of proof (level 1 and 2); neither signs nor scores have been validated internally or externally because of the low number of subjects.

Conclusion: The diagnosis of dehydration due to acute diarrhea in young children depends on the number of signs present, since no individual element of clinical history, clinical picture or laboratory tests distinguished dehydration. Other studies are necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2007.10.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acute diarrhea
16
history clinical
12
diagnosis dehydration
12
dehydration acute
12
clinical history
12
clinical signs
12
clinical
10
dehydration
9
diarrhea young
8
studies selected
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!