Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants

Eastman Dental Center, Division of Prosthodontics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14620, USA.

Published: March 2008

Purpose: The specific aims of this study were to measure the implant and abutment hexagonal dimensions, to measure the rotational misfit between implant and abutments, and to correlate the dimension of the gap present between the abutment and implant hexagons with the rotational misfit of 5 abutment-implant combinations from 2 manufacturers.

Materials And Methods: Twenty new externally hexed implants (n = 10 for Nobel Biocare; n = 10 for Biomet/3i) and 50 new abutments were used (n = 10; Procera Zirconia; Procera Alumina; Esthetic Ceramic Abutment; ZiReal; and GingiHue post ZR Zero Rotation abutments). The mating surfaces of all implants and abutments were imaged with a scanning electron microscope before and after rotational misfit measurements. The distances between the corners and center of the implant and abutment hexagon were calculated by entering their x and y coordinates, measured on a measuring microscope, into Pythagoras' theorem. The dimensional difference between abutment and implant hexagons was calculated and correlated with the rotational misfit, which was recorded using a precision optical encoder. Each abutment was rotated (3 times/session) clockwise and counterclockwise until binding. Analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to compare rotational misfit among groups (alpha = .05).

Results: With respect to rotational misfit, the abutment groups were significantly different from one another (P < .001), with the exception of the Procera Zirconia and Esthetic Ceramic groups (P = .4). The mean rotational misfits in degrees were 4.13 +/- 0.68 for the Procera Zirconia group, 3.92 +/- 0.62 for the Procera Alumina group, 4.10 +/- 0.67 for the Esthetic Ceramic group, 3.48 +/- 0.40 for the ZiReal group, and 1.61 +/- 0.24 for the GingiHue post ZR group. There was no correlation between the mean implant-abutment gap and rotational misfit.

Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, machining inconsistencies of the hexagons were found for all implants and abutments tested. The GingiHue Post showed the smallest rotational misfit. All-ceramic abutments without a metal collar showed a greater rotational misfit than those with a metal collar.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rotational misfit
36
procera zirconia
12
esthetic ceramic
12
gingihue post
12
rotational
10
misfit
9
implant-abutment gap
8
all-ceramic abutments
8
implant abutment
8
abutment implant
8

Similar Publications

A one-step fabrication of soft-magnetic high entropy alloy fiber with excellent strength and flexibility.

Nat Commun

December 2024

CAS Key Laboratory of Magnetic Materials and Devices, Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Magnetic Materials and Application Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.

Soft-magnetic fibers (SMFs) play a crucial role in energy conversion, transmission, and storage within electronic devices. However, conventional SMFs have poor plasticity and are therefore difficult to withstand long-term tensile, torsional, and shear deformation. A high fraction of grain boundaries could improve plastic deformability of conventional SMFs, but deteriorates the coercivity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Validation of finite-element-simulated orthodontic forces produced by thermoplastic aligners: Effect of aligner geometry and creep.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater

December 2024

Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. Electronic address:

Purpose: Finite element (FE) models for determining the orthodontic forces delivered by clear aligners often lack validation. The aim of this study was to develop and validate accurate FE models for clear aligners, considering the small but important geometrical variations from the thermoforming process and the creep behavior of the aligner material.

Methods And Materials: The tooth misalignment considered was a 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nanostructured Ferecrystal Intergrowths with TaSe Unveiled High Thermoelectric Performance in -Type SnSe.

J Am Chem Soc

September 2024

New Chemistry Unit, International Centre for Materials Science and School of Advanced Materials, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Jakkur P.O., Bangalore 560064, India.

Article Synopsis
  • Ferecrystals are unique layered compounds that can effectively influence phonon transport due to their 2D structure and disorder between layers.
  • Successfully integrating these nanostructures into a bulk thermoelectric matrix has led to impressive results, achieving a thermoelectric figure of merit of approximately 2.2 at high temperatures.
  • By using Ta and Br codoping in SnSe, the study highlights a method to reduce thermal conductivity while improving electrical conductivity, thereby enhancing thermoelectric efficiency.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Direct Determination of Torsion in Twisted Graphite and MoS Interfaces.

Nano Lett

July 2024

Nanoscale Electronic Materials and Devices Laboratory, Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.

The design space of two-dimensional materials is undergoing significant expansion through the stacking of layers in non-equilibrium configurations. However, the lack of quantitative insights into twist dynamics impedes the development of such heterostructures. Herein, we utilize the lateral force sensitivity of an atomic force microscope cantilever and specially designed rotational bearing structures to measure the torque in graphite and MoS interfaces.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the repositioning accuracy of the implant- and abutment-level impression components (impression abutments and implant scan bodies) and implant abutments (with and without anti-rotational hex index); also, to estimate the tightening torque influence on the positional stability of abutments.

Methods: Seven types of prosthetic components (n = 7) [impression pick-up copings (PC), implant scan bodies (ISB), non‑hex and hex titanium base implant abutments (TB H and TB NH), multi-unit impression copings (MU PC), multi-unit implant scan bodies (MU ISB), and multi-unit caps (MU C) (Medentika GmbH)] were tested. For repositioning accuracy tests a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) was used.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!