Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the results and complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) plus retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy using laser and pneumatic lithotriptors with SWL monotherapy for renal pelvic calculi between 2 cm and 3 cm.

Materials And Methods: A total of 55 patients with 2- to 3-cm pelvic calculi were assigned into groups 1 and 2, including 22 and 33 patients, respectively. Patients in group 1 first underwent laser pneumatic lithotripsy and insertion of a double-J ureteral catheter and then underwent SWL 2 to 4 weeks thereafter. In group 2, the patients underwent SWL after double-J ureteral catheter insertion. The stone-free rate, complications, and cost effectiveness were evaluated 3 months postoperatively.

Results: Five patients (22.7%) in group 1, had their calculi completely fragmented after ureteroscopy and retrograde lithotripsy without any need for further SWL. In 9 patients (40.9%), after a single session of SWL, and in 3 (13.6%), after 2 sessions, fragmentation was completed. In group 2, successful treatment was achieved after 1 and 2 SWL sessions in 6 (18.2%) and 8 (24.2%) patients, respectively. The stone-free rate was significantly higher in the patients of group1 than those in group 2 (77.3% versus 42.4%, respectively; P = .01). The period of anesthesia was 23.1 minutes (during ureteroscopy) in group 1 and 13.2 minutes in group 2 (during cystoscopy or ureteroscopy and insertion of ureteral catheter). No significant complication was reported in neither of the groups. The mean costs of the treatment were US $ 400 and US $ 370 in groups 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusion: Ureteroscopic lithotripsy before SWL is a rational method for the treatment of the rather large renal pelvic calculi with fairly acceptable costs.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lithotripsy swl
12
pelvic calculi
12
ureteral catheter
12
extracorporeal shock
8
shock wave
8
wave lithotripsy
8
large renal
8
swl
8
ureteroscopic lithotripsy
8
laser pneumatic
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: To evaluate the success rate of shock wave lithotripsy and identify predictors of stone-free status after shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones, focusing on the impact of stones remaining in the same location for 2 months (SSL2).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 501 patients with ureteral stones treated with shock wave lithotripsy by expert surgeons (each with over 1000 shock wave lithotripsy operations) at a single Japanese institution in 2020. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors of stone-free status, including stone length, skin-to-stone distance, stone density (Hounsfield Unit), Hounsfield Unit above/below the stone, stone position, and duration of stone at the same location (SSL2).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has been considered to be effective in treating ureteral stones, a definitive conclusion remains unclear on which patient's position is the optimal option for proximal ureteral stones. The purpose of this study is to assess the ideal position of ultrasound guided SWL for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted in multi-center from June 2020 to December 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To compare stone clearance and complications between a 'wide' (9 × 50 mm) and 'narrow' shockwave focus (6 × 28 mm) when undertaking shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with renal or ureteric stones.

Methods: Data from patients undergoing SWL using the dual focus Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter at a single centre were prospectively collected between February 2018 and September 2020. Patients were matched by stone size, location, and number of treatments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A comprehensive scale was developed to measure the burdens of three types of treatment: expected, unexpected complications, and ancillary procedure needs.
  • Expert panels assessed the burden of treatments in urology cases, calculating a burden score (BS) for different treatment options including partial nephrectomy, percutaneous ablation, radical cystectomy, and others.
  • Results indicated that less invasive treatments like percutaneous ablation and trimodal therapy had similar success rates as more invasive options, but with significantly lower burden scores, aiding in patient consultations on treatment choices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study was conducted from June 2020 to December 2023 to explore how the variability in stone density (heterogenicity) affects the success of shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with high-density upper urinary tract stones.
  • The research involved 533 patients and found that 68.5% of them were successful in eliminating stones after SWL, with specific stone density measures showing significant relationships to treatment success.
  • The study concluded that higher stone heterogenicity (measured by standard deviation and coefficient of variation) is linked to better SWL outcomes, but this relationship did not extend to mean stone density.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!