Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The relationship between the sequential hard c-means (SHCM) and learning vector quantization (LVQ) clustering algorithms is discussed. The impact and interaction of these two families of methods with Kohonen's self-organizing feature mapping (SOFM), which is not a clustering method but often lends ideas to clustering algorithms, are considered. A generalization of LVQ that updates all nodes for a given input vector is proposed. The network attempts to find a minimum of a well-defined objective function. The learning rules depend on the degree of distance match to the winner node; the lesser the degree of match with the winner, the greater the impact on nonwinner nodes. Numerical results indicate that the terminal prototypes generated by this modification of LVQ are generally insensitive to initialization and independent of any choice of learning coefficient. IRIS data obtained by E. Anderson's (1939) is used to illustrate the proposed method. Results are compared with the standard LVQ approach.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/72.238310 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!