Introduction: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is caused by platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes. The frequency of HIT is highly variable in different clinical settings, and is more frequent with unfractionated heparin (UFH) than with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), despite the in vitro observation that HIT antibodies activate platelets similarly well with LMWH as with UFH. An important difference between UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux is their widely differing plasma concentrations. We aimed to provide a model that included anticoagulant concentrations and PF4 availability as risk factors influencing the anti-PF4/heparin immune response.

Materials And Methods: By photon correlation spectroscopy we determined the concentrations at which UFH, LMWH, and fondaparinux form complexes optimally with PF4. Plasma concentrations of UFH and LMWH were calculated based on ex vivo pharmacokinetic data, with information on fondaparinux and PF4 concentrations taken from the literature.

Results And Conclusions: The main features of our model are: optimal complex formation occurs at prophylactic-dose UFH and high PF4 levels, whereas therapeutic-dose LMWH concentrations are too high for optimal complex formation; in contrast, concentrations of fondaparinux are usually below the optimal stoichiometric range. Thus, immunization should occur more often in situations with major rather than minor platelet activation, and--for a given degree of platelet activation (PF4 availability)--as: prophylactic-dose UFH>therapeutic-dose UFH>prophylactic-dose LMWH, fondaparinux>therapeutic-dose LMWH. Our model provides a framework for explaining empirical observations that LMWH induces less anti-PF4/heparin antibodies than does UFH, and that anti-PF4/heparin antibodies are more often found in patients undergoing major surgery than in medical patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2007.11.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ufh lmwh
12
lmwh
9
heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
8
unfractionated heparin
8
low-molecular-weight heparin
8
clinical settings
8
lmwh fondaparinux
8
plasma concentrations
8
concentrations ufh
8
optimal complex
8

Similar Publications

Background: Anticoagulants are the primary means for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but their clinical standardized application still remains controversial. The present study intends to comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of various anticoagulants in VTE.

Methods: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from their inception up to August 2023 were searched to compare the efficacy and safety of various anticoagulants in VTE.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Hemodialysis patients need long-term frequent use of parenteral anticoagulants, and the side effects need to be taken seriously. This study aimed to assess the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following administration of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), fondaparinux, and danaparoid, in relation to their usage in European Economic Area (EEA).

Materials And Methods: The total number of ADRs of each anticoagulant between 2017 to 2021 was collected using data from the EudraVigilance database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Despite guideline recommendations to use low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) or direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of most patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), US-based studies have found increasing use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hospitalized patients.

Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This qualitative study conducted semistructured interviews from February 1 to June 3, 2024, that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process using reflexive thematic analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Obesity is a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and poses unique challenges in anticoagulation management due to limited research on how extreme body weight affects medication outcomes.
  • This review focuses on patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m² or higher, analyzing various anticoagulants' dosages, efficacy, and safety for both prevention and treatment of VTE.
  • The study emphasizes the need for personalized treatment strategies and careful monitoring, especially for specific groups like cancer patients or those with kidney issues, given the insufficient evidence available for effective anticoagulant therapy in morbidly obese individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a significant risk of hemodynamic deterioration or death. Treatment should balance efficacy in reducing clot burden with the risk of complications, particularly bleeding. Previous studies on high-dose, short-term thrombolysis with alteplase (rtPA) showed a reduced risk of hemodynamic deterioration but no change in mortality and increased bleeding complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!