Refractive errors in type 2 diabetic patients.

East Afr Med J

Mansa General Hospital, P.O. Box 710156, Chembe Road, Mansa, Luapula, Zambia.

Published: June 2007

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and pattern of refractive errors among African type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and establish the relationship between baseline refractive status and degree of glycaemic control.

Design: A hospital based cross sectional study.

Setting: Diabetic medical and eye clinics at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH).

Subjects: Ninety six type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Results: Ninety six patients aged 28 to 76 years were examined. The male to female ratio was 1:1.5 and about half of the patients (52.1%) had good glycaemic control. The prevalence of myopia was 39.5% and that of hypermetropia was 19.0%. Twenty two percent of the study patients had mild diabetic retinopathy (DR). Of the eyes with DR, 20% (15/75) were myopic, 19.4% (7/36) were hypermetropic and 26.6% (21/79) were emmetropic. There was no statistically significant correlation between baseline refractive status with DR (p = 0.358), or HBA1C (glycosylated haemoglobin) (rho = 0.130, p-value = 0.249 among myopes) or FBS (fasting blood sugar) (rho =0.089, p-value = 0.438 among myopes and rho = 0.158, p-value = 0.350 among hyperopes). However, there was a statistically significant correlation between baseline hypermetropic refractive status and HBA1C (rho = 0.401, p-value = 0.014).

Conclusions: Refractive errors were seen in 58.5% of the patients with myopia being the most common type (39.5%) followed by hypermetropia 19.0%. There was no statistically significant relationship between baseline refractive status and indicators of glycaemic control except for hypermetropic refractive status and HBA1C. According to the results of this study, it is not mandatory to ask for HBA1C or FBS results before issuing spectacle prescription to adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are already on treatment. However, there is need to emphasise the need for good glycaemic control to minimise the other ocular complications. A similar study should be done on young people with type I diabetes mellitus.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v84i6.9534DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

refractive status
20
type diabetes
16
diabetes mellitus
16
refractive errors
12
baseline refractive
12
glycaemic control
12
refractive
8
relationship baseline
8
good glycaemic
8
395% hypermetropia
8

Similar Publications

Myopia prevalence, refractive status and uncorrected myopia among primary and secondary school students in Germany.

Front Med (Lausanne)

December 2024

Research Unit Vision, Visual Impairments and Blindness, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.

Introduction: The increasing prevalence of myopia worldwide is problematic because myopia can result in severe secondary pathologies, and is associated with considerable financial burden. With plenty of prevalence data available for some regions, current data for Europe remain sparse. Yet, information on myopia prevalence and associations is essential for monitoring, preventive and interventive purposes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Scleral-fixated intraocular lens (SFIOL) is a widely used technique for IOL implantation in patients where capsular support is insufficient. Most surgeons have shifted away from sutured to sutureless SFIOL techniques where haptics of a multifocal IOL are inserted in scleral tunnels/flaps. Large-scale publications have shown wide variation in the refractive status of eyes post-SFIOL even in the best of the hands.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Artificial intelligence virtual assistants in primary eye care practice.

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt

December 2024

Optometry and Vision Sciences Research Group, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Purpose: To propose a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based virtual assistant trained on tabular clinical data that can provide decision-making support in primary eye care practice and optometry education programmes.

Method: Anonymised clinical data from 1125 complete optometric examinations (2250 eyes; 63% women, 37% men) were used to train different machine learning algorithm models to predict eye examination classification (refractive, binocular vision dysfunction, ocular disorder or any combination of these three options). After modelling, adjustment, mining and preprocessing (one-hot encoding and SMOTE techniques), 75 input (preliminary data, history, oculomotor test and ocular examinations) and three output (refractive, binocular vision status and eye disease) features were defined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!