The medical profession has an increasing interface with the profession of law and in no specialty is this more apparent than in pediatric neurosurgery. The areas of interface include the neurosurgeon as a defendant, as an expert witness, and as an ethicist. The role of a neurosurgical defendant may be eased if he/she is aware of the legal principles involved in malpractice litigation. This article discusses the doctrine of 'standard of care' as it applies presently in malpractice cases. The accepted defenses to a claim of breach of standard of care are outlined. The history of the principle of 'informed consent' is discussed briefly, as well as its present application. The position of the mature minor and emancipated minor in the process of informed consent is described. Finally, a few recommendations for avoidance of malpractice are suggested.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000120600DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medicolegal issues
4
issues pediatric
4
pediatric neurosurgical
4
neurosurgical practice
4
practice medical
4
medical profession
4
profession increasing
4
increasing interface
4
interface profession
4
profession law
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!