Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The overall accuracy of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) used to detect Johne's disease at herd level was explored in relation to an imperfect test (fecal culture) in 57 Israeli dairy herds. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated an area under the curve (AUC) that corresponded to a test accuracy of 82.0% (69.5% to 90.9%; 95% confidence), with optimized herd sensitivity and herd specificity of 70.4% and 83.3%, respectively; and predictive values of 79.2 (+) and 75.8% (-). The optimal ELISA cutoff was 3.16% (> 3.16% seropositive cows in a herd), which was associated with likelihood ratios (LR) of 4.22 (+LR) and 0.36 (-LR), and post-test probabilities of 0.79 (+) and 0.17 (-). For herds with < or = 200 cows (n = 19 herds), the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the AUC was 0.62-0.97 and the optimal cutoff was 3.33% (HSe = 87.5, HSp = 81.8); for herds with > 200 but < or = 270 cows (n = 19 herds), the 95% AUC CI was 0.62-0.97 and the optimal cutoff was 1.13% (HSe = 90.0, HSp = 77.78); and for herds with > 270 cows (n = 19 herds), the 95% AUC CI was 0.69-0.99 and the optimal cutoff was 0.7% (HSe = 100.0, HSp = 70.0). The AUC was not influenced by across-herd prevalence [R2 (adjusted) = 0.0, P > 0.05]. Findings may be applied to facilitate targeted sampling of herds similar to those evaluated. For instance, a test cutoff of 0.76% could be considered for "ruling disease in," while a cutoff of 3.7% could be used for "ruling disease out." Caveats that may influence this analysis are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2117362 | PMC |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!