Background And Objective: Resumption of oral anticoagulation after surgery may result in a different maintenance dose of warfarin than before the procedure. Knowledge of the clinical determinants of postoperative response could help avoid excessive anticoagulation in sensitive patients or avoid extended delays in achieving a therapeutic level in resistant patients.
Design: Retrospective review.
Subjects: Two hundred warfarin-treated patients who were managed by our clinic for surgery.
Outcome: Two independent adjudicators classified the postoperative response to warfarin as Resistant, Normal or Sensitive, based on previous maintenance dose, international normalized ratio (INR) on the day of resumption, number of days until INR of >1.9 and doses of warfarin given. A third adjudicator resolved disagreements. Clinical data were extracted from the patient records and correlated with the response.
Results: Interobserver agreement for classification of postoperative response was moderate (weighted kappa 0.46) with 37 (18.5%) considered resistant, 135 (67.5%) normal, 27 (13.5%) sensitive and one patient was not classifiable. The main type of surgery was cardiac. In univariable analysis only addition of amiodarone after surgery was associated with a sensitive response (P = 0.04). After adjustment for all other factors with an ordered categorical response, amiodarone remained as the sole independent risk factor (P = 0.02) for a sensitive response, odds ratio 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.19-0.89) for Normal instead of Sensitive or for Resistant instead of Normal.
Conclusion: Altered sensitivity to warfarin occurs in about one-third of patients after surgery and can be predicted by the introduction of concomitant amiodarone therapy but not by patient factors or the nature of the procedure. Changes in concomitant medications after surgery should alert doctors of the potential for increased sensitivity to warfarin.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01913.x | DOI Listing |
J Am Heart Assoc
January 2025
Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company Titusville NJ USA.
Background: The economic burden of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is substantial. Many patients with NVAF are obese and manage other health conditions requiring multiple medications. This real-world study compared health care resource use (HRU) and costs for rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with NVAF who had polypharmacy and obesity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCardiovasc Drugs Ther
December 2024
Vascular Surgery Department, General Surgery Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun City, Jilin Province, P.R. China.
Purpose: This meta-analysis aimed to conduct a systematic evaluation of the comparative efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
Methods: A systematic computerized search of databases including PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and www.
Clinicaltrials: gov .
AAPS J
December 2024
Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Groton, CT, USA.
Accurate measurement of plasma protein binding (PPB) is of critical importance in drug discovery. Methodologies for PPB measurement continue to evolve to address the challenges of highly bound compounds. In order to generate high quality PPB data, it is crucial to not only apply state-of-the-art methods and highly sensitive and selective detectors, but also use high-quality plasma.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHosp Pharm
November 2024
Department of Clinical and Pharmacy Practice, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Puncak Alam, Cawangan Selangor, Malaysia.
In Asian countries, warfarin is still widely used for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation compared to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) due to its affordability. A tool such as the SAMe-TTR is needed to determine the probability of achieving and maintaining good anticoagulation control with warfarin therapy. However, it requires validation in the Malaysian cohort.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Res Notes
November 2024
Department of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) imposes a substantial economic and clinical burden, particularly in developing countries like Iran. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation options for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in Iran.
Methods: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran 110 mg, dabigatran 150 mg, and rivaroxaban for NVAF patients from the Iranian payer's perspective.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!