Purpose: The aims of this retrospective study were to assess the subjective accuracy of predictions generated by a computer imaging software in Chinese patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery and to determine the influence of initial dysgnathia and complexity of the surgical procedure on prediction accuracy.
Patients And Methods: The sample consisted of 40 Chinese patients who had completed treatment involving orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. All the patients had lateral cephalometric radiographs and profile photographs taken within 3 months before surgery and at least 6 months after surgery. The computer-generated predicted images and the actual post-treatment images were displayed simultaneously to a panel of orthodontists, oral maxillofacial surgeons and laypersons to allow side-by-side comparison. The panel was asked to determine which image was more esthetic and to rate the likeness between the actual and predicted images using a 10 cm visual analog scale.
Results: The results showed that the actual image was judged to be more esthetic in 82% of the cases, with the orthodontists more likely to select the actual profile compared to laypersons (P = .005). Orthodontists and surgeons rated the likeness of the images similarly while laypersons rated the likeness significantly lower than the clinicians (P = .012 and P = .015, respectively). Skeletal III cases were judged to be less accurately predicted than skeletal II cases by laypersons (P = .006) and orthodontists (P = .036). Cases treated by single-jaw osteotomy were given better ratings compared to cases with bimaxillary osteotomy by all panel groups but the differences did not reach significant level.
Conclusions: Skeletal III cases managed by bimaxillary osteotomy were least accurately predicted by the computer program. As there exists a possibility that the predicted image may be judged to be more esthetic than the actual image, clinicians must make extra effort to manage patient expectations when using computer simulations for patient education.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.629 | DOI Listing |
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Section of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Objective: To investigate and compare the morphology of the sphenoid sinus (SS) in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and the control group.
Design: A retrospective comparative study.
Setting: Craniofacial rehabilitation institution.
BMC Oral Health
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ordu University, Cumhuriyet Yerleşkesi Cumhuriyet Mahallesi, 52200, Ordu, Türkiye, Turkey.
Background: This study evaluates the efficacy of carbon fiber reinforced Polyetheretherketone (Cfr-PEEK) in fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) by comparing it with titanium in vitro.
Methods: Twenty-eight sheep hemimandibles were randomly assigned to four groups for SSRO surgery. Fixation was performed with a 4-hole titanium mini plate for 5 mm advancement in Group 1, with a 4-hole Cfr-PEEK mini plate for 5 mm advancement for Group 2, with a 4-hole titanium mini plate for 10 mm advancement for Group 3, and with a 4-hole Cfr-PEEK mini plate for 10 mm advancement for Group 4.
Natl J Maxillofac Surg
November 2024
Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College & Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
This study is intended to review the cephalometric data pertaining to the diverse Indian populace through a systematic literature survey. To conduct a systematic review of literature, an electronic search was done on Medline, Embase, and Central databases. The available data were categorized based on the existing five geographic locations of the country (north, south, east, west, and central India) and analyzed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Oral Investig
January 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, Nijmegen, 6525, GA, the Netherlands.
Objectives: To assess the effect of patient positioning and general anesthesia on the condylar position in orthognathic surgery.
Materials And Methods: This prospective study included patients undergoing orthognathic surgery between 2019 and 2020. Four weeks prior to surgery (T0) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and intra-oral scans (IOS) were acquired in an upright position.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
December 2024
Professor, Private Practice, Proimtech A.Ş., Istanbul, Turkey.
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after orthognathic surgery remains one of the most common side effects despite the use of several medications.
Purpose: The study aimed to compare the frequencies of PONV between a combination of metoclopramide with granisetron and granisetron alone.
Study Design, Setting, Sample: A randomized double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 66 consecutive patients who underwent orthognathic surgery at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Bezmialem Vakif University.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!