AI Article Synopsis

  • Collecting data on medical errors is crucial for enhancing patient safety, yet understanding the factors that influence physicians' reporting of these errors remains unclear.
  • A study surveying 338 physicians across the Midwest, mid-Atlantic, and Northeast U.S. found that while a majority believed reporting improves care, only a small percentage reported actual errors they encountered.
  • Factors promoting error reporting included the belief in quality improvement through reporting, knowledge of how to report, support for forgiveness in the system, and being a faculty member rather than a resident.

Article Abstract

Background: Collecting data on medical errors is essential for improving patient safety, but factors affecting error reporting by physicians are poorly understood.

Methods: Survey of faculty and resident physicians in the midwest, mid-Atlantic, and northeast regions of the United States to investigate reporting of actual errors, likelihood of reporting hypothetical errors, attitudes toward reporting errors, and demographic factors.

Results: Responses were received from 338 participants (response rate, 74.0%). Most respondents agreed that reporting errors improves the quality of care for future patients (84.3%) and would likely report a hypothetical error resulting in minor (73%) or major (92%) harm to a patient. However, only 17.8% of respondents had reported an actual minor error (resulting in prolonged treatment or discomfort), and only 3.8% had reported an actual major error (resulting in disability or death). Moreover, 16.9% acknowledged not reporting an actual minor error, and 3.8% acknowledged not reporting an actual major error. Only 54.8% of respondents knew how to report errors, and only 39.5% knew what kind of errors to report. Multivariate analyses of answers to hypothetical vignettes showed that willingness to report was positively associated with believing that reporting improves the quality of care, knowing how to report errors, believing in forgiveness, and being a faculty physician (vs a resident).

Conclusion: Most faculty and resident physicians are inclined to report harm-causing hypothetical errors, but only a minority have actually reported an error.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2007.12DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reporting actual
12
errors
10
reporting
9
medical errors
8
patient safety
8
faculty resident
8
resident physicians
8
hypothetical errors
8
reporting errors
8
improves quality
8

Similar Publications

Effects of long-term steroid therapy on the results of dental age estimation using pulp/tooth ratio.

J Forensic Odontostomatol

December 2024

Department of Medicine and Health Science "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, AgeEstimation Project, Campobasso, Italy.

Forensic age estimation is performed by assessing pulp chamber constrictions due to physiological age-related changes in dental radiographs; however, the estimated ages occasionally deviate from the actual ages. In particular, long-term steroid users tend to demonstrate pulp chamber constrictions in all teeth. Because this is uncommon among younger age groups, caution should be exercised when evaluating pulp chamber constriction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tracheal mucosal keratosis: Case discussion and literature review.

Chron Respir Dis

January 2025

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

A 57-year-old female presented with a chief complaint of cough, with productive yellow sputum particularly severe in the morning. Bronchoscopy revealed inflammatory changes in both main bronchi, with abundant white purulent secretions and necrotic material adhering to the luminal surface. Histopathological examination showed chronic inflammatory changes in the mucosal tissue, with mild hyperplasia of the local squamous epithelium and evidence of keratinization in the surrounding area, consistent with a diagnosis of tracheal mucosal keratosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The purpose of this review was to identify relationships between social determinants of mental health service utilization and outcomes among Asian American cancer survivors in the United States (U.S.).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) may represent the initial symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD), but SCD may be absent and/or unrelated to actual cognitive decline. Objective Subtle Cognitive Decline (obj-SCD) can be identified through longitudinal standardized neuropsychological tests in individuals not yet meeting criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). We argue that the relationship between SCD and obj-SCD might help to inform clinical and research criteria in pre-MCI stages.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical Manifestations.

Alzheimers Dement

December 2024

Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Background: Family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD) or undiagnosed memory problems is linked to an increased risk of dementia. Subjective memory complaints are also more common among individuals with positive family history, which could be indicative of heightened awareness of memory deficits in these people. Here, we conducted an online study in cognitively normal individuals across the lifespan and aimed to examine whether the presence of family history is linked to worse objective memory performance that mediates the lower subjective memory in these individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!