A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Colorectal cancer screening: a guide to the guidelines. | LitMetric

Colorectal cancer screening: a guide to the guidelines.

Rev Gastroenterol Disord

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Published: February 2008

The best known guidelines for colorectal cancer screening in the United States are those of the US Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, the American Cancer Society, the United States Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Screening is currently endorsed for both average-risk and high-risk persons by all guideline groups. Some guidelines offer a menu of options for average-risk persons, from which patients and physicians can select according to their perceptions and values regarding effectiveness, risk, and upfront costs. The alternative approach of colonoscopy as the preferred strategy simplifies discussions with patients and better reflects current trends in procedure use in the United States. For patients who refuse invasive testing, fecal occult blood testing is available. Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests offer promise for improved performance compared with guaiac testing. Radiographic screening has declined, although double contrast barium enema still remains an option in some guidelines. Computed tomographic colonography remains under active consideration but is not yet endorsed by any of the guidelines. High risk is still based primarily on family history, and the guidelines are fairly consistent in adjusting screening modality and intervals according to family history.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal cancer
12
united states
12
cancer screening
8
task force
8
family history
8
guidelines
6
screening
5
screening guide
4
guide guidelines
4
guidelines best
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!