Role of a hepatectomy for the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinomas measuring 10 cm or larger in diameter.

Background: A curative hepatectomy is the mainstay of effective treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the treatment of large HCC remains challenging.

Materials And Methods: The possible prognostic factors were retrospectively analyzed in 85 patients with large HCC (> or = 10.0 cm) who all underwent a hepatectomy for HCC between 1988 and 2004. A survival analysis was made by classifying the tumors into four spreading patterns according to the number of tumors and the presence of macroscopic tumor thrombus.

Results: A positive hepatitis B antigen, the earlier period of hepatectomy, a non-curative hepatectomy, multiple tumors, and portal vein invasion were identified as independent predictors of a poor prognosis. The median survival term and 5-year survival rate of patients with a solitary large HCC without a macroscopic tumor thrombus was 9.8 years and 69.8%, respectively. The tumor spreading patterns according to the number of tumors and the presence of a macroscopic tumor thrombus were statistically associated with a non-curative hepatectomy (p < 0.001). There was a statistical difference among 33 patients with large HCC undergoing a non-curative hepatectomy based on the presence of a macroscopic portal vein invasion (p = 0.0089).

Conclusion: A hepatectomy could yield an excellent long-term survival in patients with a solitary large HCC without a macroscopic tumor thrombus. Even if a curative hepatectomy could not be achieved, a hepatectomy might provide better survival in large HCC patients without a macroscopic tumor thrombus compared in those with macroscopic tumor thrombus.