https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pubmed&id=18180338&retmode=xml&tool=Litmetric&email=readroberts32@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09 181803382008022520220321
1527-131524622008FebRadiologyRadiologyEstrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression.367375367-7510.1148/radiol.2462070169To prospectively determine if estrogen receptor (ER)-negative human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive and ER-negative HER2-negative breast cancers have distinguishing clinical and imaging features with use of retrospectively identified patients and tissue samples.This HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved. Informed consent was obtained from living patients and waived for deceased patients. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 53 years (range, 31-84 years). Clinical history; histopathologic, mammographic, and breast sonographic findings; and HER2 status as determined with immunohistochemistry or fluorescent in situ hybridization were evaluated in 56 women with ER-negative breast cancer. Imaging appearances and clinicopathologic characteristics were correlated with tumor HER2 status. P < .05 indicated a significant difference.Lesion margins on mammograms (P = .028) and sonograms (P = .023), calcifications on mammograms (P = .003), and clinical cancer stage at diagnosis (P = .029) were significantly associated with HER2 status. In contrast to ER-negative HER2-negative tumors, ER-negative HER2-positive tumors were more likely to have spiculated margins (56% vs 15%), be associated with calcifications (65% vs 21%), and be detected at a higher cancer stage (74% vs 57%).Biologic diversity of cancers may manifest in imaging characteristics, and, conversely, studying the range of imaging features of cancers may help refine current molecular phenotypes.(c) RSNA, 2008.WangYingbingYDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5494, USA.IkedaDebra MDMNarasimhanBalasubramanianBLongacreTeri ATABleicherRichard JRJPalSunitaSJackmanRoger JRJJeffreyStefanie SSSengComparative StudyJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't20080107
United StatesRadiology04012600033-84190Biomarkers, TumorEC 2.7.10.1ERBB2 protein, humanEC 2.7.10.1Receptor, ErbB-2IMAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumormetabolismBreast NeoplasmsclassificationdiagnosismetabolismCalcinosisclassificationdiagnosismetabolismFemaleHumansMaleMammographymethodsMiddle AgedReceptor, ErbB-2metabolismReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity
2008199020082269020081990ppublish1818033810.1148/radiol.24620701692462070169