AI Article Synopsis
- Bioanalytical methods in drug development must be validated to ensure they work as intended, especially when analyzing "incurred" study samples that may differ from standards.
- The 3rd AAPS/FDA Bioanalytical Workshop recommended evaluating the reproducibility of analyzing these incurred samples alongside standard validation activities.
- The manuscript offers guidance on sample types for evaluation, data analysis, and reporting, serving as a foundation for future discussions and revisions on the topic.
Article Abstract
Bioanalytical methods used to support the drug development process are validated to ensure that they function in the manner in which they are intended. "Incurred" or study samples can vary in their composition when compared with the standards and quality control samples used to validate the method and analyze these samples. During the 3rd American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists(AAPS)/Food and Drug Administration(FDA) Bioanalytical Workshop, it was suggested that the reproducibility in the analysis of incurred samples be evaluated in addition to the usual prestudy validation activities performed. This manuscript provides recommendations concerning the number and types of samples that should be analyzed in such an evaluation, as well as the manner in which the resultant data should be analyzed. Suggestions as to follow-up activities and data reporting are also discussed. This approach is at best a beginning and is offered as a platform for future discussion, comments, and revision.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2751485 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/aapsj0903040 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!