A community sample of 226 participants (41% men, 59% women) who answered questions about a trial summary that manipulated what type of witness (a 45-year-old hearsay [second-hand information based on the report of a crime victim] witness, a 75-year-old hearsay witness, or the 75-year-old victim) presented an allegation of elder physical abuse. Overall, participants who read the testimony of a 45-year-old hearsay witness had higher conviction rates than participants who read the testimony of the 75-year-old hearsay witness or the elder victim. Additionally, participants who had previously been victims of abuse and/or who had positive attitudes toward elderly people rendered more pro-prosecution verdicts. Finally, as the age of the participant increased so did conviction rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J084v19n03_02DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hearsay witness
16
elder physical
8
physical abuse
8
45-year-old hearsay
8
witness 75-year-old
8
75-year-old hearsay
8
participants read
8
read testimony
8
conviction rates
8
witness
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!