Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment of resorbed posterior mandibles with interpositional bone grafts (the "sandwich" technique) and implant-supported prostheses. Six consecutive patients with resorbed posterior mandibles (seven sites) were 4reated by the sandwich osteotomy technique with an interpositional bone graft harvested from the iliac crest. Vertical bone height was measured before surgery and 3 to 4 months later, prior to implant placement, on computed tomography scans to evaluate the augmentation obtained. In all the treated sites it was possible to place implants. None of the 21 implants placed failed, and minimal bone resorption was present 14 to 16 months after the prosthetic loading. If confirmed by long-term follow-up studies and more cases, these findings suggest that interpositional bone grafting in the posterior mandible could be a viable alternative to other surgical techniques.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!