Stroke, the leading cause of disability in the United States, results in significant limitations for an estimated 5.5 million American adults. The degree of physical limitations does not explain why some individuals with severe impairments adapt well, whereas others with little impairment are severely disabled. The concept of cognitive appraisal may partly explain this apparent contradiction. The purposes of this early instrument development study were to (1) identify appraisals made by community-dwelling stroke survivors and (2) seek evidence of the face and content validity for the 3 subscales of the Appraisal of Health Scale. A cross-sectional design was used to explore the survivors' appraisals. Responses to open-ended questions provided evidence of the face validity for all subscales. Threat and benefit subscales had acceptable evidence of content validity. Further instrument development is warranted and may lead to a more accurate measurement of how stroke survivors appraise the multiple demands of stroke recovery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NUR.0000304179.51815.3aDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

instrument development
12
cognitive appraisal
8
appraisal health
8
health scale
8
early instrument
8
stroke survivors
8
evidence face
8
content validity
8
validity subscales
8
stroke
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!