Gross and pathologic analysis of long-term silicone implants inserted into the human body for augmentation rhinoplasty: 221 revision cases.

Plast Reconstr Surg

Seoul, South Korea; and Orlando, Fla. From the Simmian Aesthetic Clinic and Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, and Florida Ear, Nose, and Throat and Facial Plastic Surgery.

Published: December 2007

Background: In augmentation rhinoplasty, delayed morphologic changes are often observed with silicone implants, despite them being known as a safe implant material. The purpose of this study was to identify the cause and time course of delayed shape changes of silicone implants, through the long-term evaluation of inserted implants and their surrounding nasal soft tissues after their removal at revision rhinoplasty operations.

Methods: Two hundred twenty-one silicone implants removed during revision rhinoplasty were studied. The period of insertion ranged from 1 month to 25 years, with an average of 6 years 7 months. Calcification within the silicone implants and, when available, the capsular soft-tissue attachments were examined with the naked eye and light microscopy.

Results: Calcification was first observed grossly with the naked eye after 5 years 8 months of insertion. With light microscopy, calcification debris could be seen after 4 years. After implant insertion for more than 9 years, focal calcification could be seen in 50 percent of implants. When implants had been inserted for more than 15 years, a denatured type of large calcification was clearly observed. Plasma cell, macrophage, and neutrophil proliferation was noted in the soft-tissue capsule surrounding the superficial calcifications in those individuals with an early inflammatory response, and lymphocyte proliferation was noted in those with a late inflammatory response.

Conclusions: Silicone implants were noted to induce calcification when inserted for a long time, causing long-term morphologic changes. This should be taken into consideration when choosing silicone implants for augmentation rhinoplasty.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000287323.71630.e6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

silicone implants
28
augmentation rhinoplasty
12
implants
10
implants inserted
8
morphologic changes
8
revision rhinoplasty
8
years months
8
naked eye
8
silicone
7
years
6

Similar Publications

Animal models that help us understand how elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) causes axonal injury will lead to new glaucoma therapies. Because reliable measurements are difficult to obtain in chronic models, we developed the controlled elevation of IOP (CEI) approach. Here, a cannula connected to an elevated balanced salt solution (BSS) reservoir is inserted into the anterior chamber of anesthetized Brown Norway rats.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Understanding the relationship between silicone implants, tumor antigens, and breast cancer risk: An immunological study in rats.

Int Immunopharmacol

January 2025

Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, PR China; National Key Clinical Specialty (Wound Healing), The First Affiliate d Hospital Of Wenzhou Medical University, PR China. Electronic address:

This study aimed to investigate the effects of silicone implants on the incidence of breast cancer in rats, as well as their impact on immune surveillance mechanisms. Female SD rats were divided into three groups: a Placebo Surgery Group (PSG), a Thoracic Implant Group (TIG), and a Back Implant Group (BIG). Following the corresponding surgical procedures, we measured Secretoglobin Family 2A, Member 2(SCGB2A2) and Mucin-1 (MUC1) antigen levels using ELISA, and statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate immune responses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Low-cost male urogenital simulator for penile implant surgery training: a 3D printing approach.

3D Print Med

January 2025

Department of Surgical & Interventional Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.

Background: Penile implant surgery is the standard surgical treatment for end-stage erectile dysfunction. However, the growing complexity of modern high-tech penile prostheses has increased the demand for more practical training opportunities. The most advanced contemporary training methods involve simulation training using cadavers, with costs exceeding $5,000 per cadaver, inclusive of biohazard fees.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Silicone breast implants (SBIs) are commonly used for breast reconstruction and cosmetic surgery. However, long-term complications associated with SBI, such as rupture and infection, require careful monitoring. Here, we report a case in which coronavirus disease 2019 infection led to immunosuppression and secondary bacterial infection, resulting in skin ulceration and eventual removal of the SBI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) induced by rapid bacterial colonization and biofilm formation on urinary catheters is a key issue that urgently needs to be addressed. To prevent CAUTI, many contact-killing, non-leaching coatings have been developed for the surfaces of silicone catheters. However, due to the chemical inertness of the silicone substrate, most current coatings lack adhesion and are unstable under external forces.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!