Objective: To compare efficacy, sedation duration, and adverse events after administration of etomidate or pentobarbital for diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans.
Methods: A cohort of children sedated for CT scans between July 2004 and October 2005 was identified from a prospectively generated Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium database. The 24 Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium institutions prospectively record consecutive sedation data and adverse events on a Web-based tool. This study included all patients of American Society for Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II, between 6 months and 6 years old, sedated with etomidate or with intravenous pentobarbital with or without midazolam. Outcomes included sedation efficacy, duration (time from drug administration until cessation of monitoring), and complication rate.
Results: Of 3397 pediatric sedations for CT scans, 2587 met age and ASA criteria. Etomidate was administered by pediatric emergency physicians as the sole sedative for 446 sedation service cases; pentobarbital with or without midazolam was used in 396 sedations by a variety of providers. Sedation was "not ideal" for 11 pentobarbital sedations and 1 etomidate sedation. Median etomidate dose was 0.33 mg/kg (intraquartile rank, 0.30-0.44 mg/kg); median pentobarbital dose was 4 mg/kg (intraquartile rank, 3.2-4.8 mg/kg). Mean etomidate sedation (34 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32-36 minutes) was shorter than pentobarbital (144 minutes; 95% CI, 139-150 minutes). Etomidate patients were younger (24 vs. 29 months), whereas pentobarbital patients were more often of ASA class II (52% vs. 34%), both P < 0.001. Adverse events were more common with pentobarbital (4.5% vs. 0.9%; relative risk, 3.38%; 95% CI, 1.28%-9.45%). One etomidate and 2 pentobarbital patients experienced apnea.
Conclusions: Etomidate as given by emergency physicians was more effective and efficient than pentobarbital, with rare adverse events.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181558d5c | DOI Listing |
The kinetically-derived maximal dose (KMD) is defined as the maximum external dose at which kinetics are unchanged relative to lower doses, e.g., doses at which kinetic processes are not saturated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Med
January 2025
IRCCS IstitutoOrtopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) in reducing disability and pain compared to other interventions in chronic spinal pain patients.
Methods: Five databases were queried to October 2023 for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including patients with chronic spinal pain and administering CFT. Primary outcomes were disability and pain.
Pak J Pharm Sci
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu, China.
Traditional sedatives like Propofol can lead to adverse effects. This study compares the safety and efficacy of Ciprofol monotherapy versus combined Propofol for painless gastroscopy. Patients underwent painless gastroscopy at our hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were studied.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPak J Pharm Sci
January 2025
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Putuo Central Hospital, Shanghai, China.
This study aimed to use meta-analytic techniques to evaluate aspirin's safety and effectiveness in treating elderly patients with sepsis. We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Medline databases for relevant literature, screened and extracted key data and Stata 12.0 was used for comprehensive analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Anesthesiol
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.95 Yongan Road, Beijing, Xicheng District, 100050, China.
Background: As a popularly used analgesic adjuvant, intravenous (IV) lidocaine could reduce the consumption of propofol in painless gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. However, whether IV lidocaine could affect the incidence of oxygen-desaturation episodes (ODE) during painless GI endoscopy is still unknown. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that IV lidocaine could decrease the incidence of propofol-induced ODE and involuntary movements in patients during GI endoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!