A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Angiocardiographic evaluation of the left ventricular function in adult and pediatric subjects with interatrial defect of the ostium secundum type]. | LitMetric

In order to assess left ventricular function in adults and children with ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD), 42 patients were examined by hemodynamic and angiocardiographic techniques. Patients were divided into three groups: Group I, 18 patients (mean age 42 years) with ASD; Group II, 14 patients (mean age 9 years) with ASD; Group III, 10 patients without cardiopathies who represented the control group. The following parameters of ventricular function were assessed: left ventricular end diastolic volume, global and regional left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular telediastolic pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, the ratio between pulmonary flow and systemic flow (QP/QS). Group I patients showed higher values of left ventricular end diastolic pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure (16 +/- 0.6 mmHg; 33 +/- 1.5 mmHg) in relation to those of Group II (5.1 +/- 0.4 mmHg; 14 +/- 1.4 mmHg) and Group III (8.1 +/- 0.5 mmHg; 18 +/- 1.6 mmHg). In both cases the difference was statistically significant (p less than 0.001). A significant difference (p less than 0.05) was also noted in the incidence of mitral valve prolapse between patients in Group I and II. There was no significant difference (p = NS) however, between overall ejection fraction values in the three groups of patients; a lower regional ejection fraction (postero-basal segment) was recorded in Group I patients with mitral valve prolapse in comparison to patients in the other two groups (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

left ventricular
24
+/- mmhg
24
group patients
16
ventricular function
12
ejection fraction
12
mmhg +/-
12
patients
10
group
9
ostium secundum
8
three groups
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!