Purpose: The efficacy of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and treosulfan (CGT) was evaluated in patients with chemotherapy pretreated relapsed AJCC stage IV uveal malignant melanoma.
Methods: Patients received i.v./intrahepatic cisplatin, i.v. gemcitabine, and i.v. treosulfan (CGT) on day 1 and 8 as first-line (n = 1), second-line (n = 9), third-line (n = 1) or fourth-line (n = 1) therapy. Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and treosulfan (CGT)-therapy was repeated every 5 weeks until progression of disease occurred. A maximum of six CGT-cycles (mean, 2 cycles) was administered per patient.
Results: No objective response was observed, six patients (50%) had stable disease and six (50%) patients progressed upon first reevaluation. Overall survival of all the 12 patients was 6 months. Patients with stable disease reached a median overall survival of 12 months, while patients with disease progression upon first reevaluation had a median overall survival of 4 months, only. Grade III/IV related hematotological side effects were experienced in six (leukopenia) and four (thrombocytopenia) patients.
Conclusions: Treatment with CGT may lead to disease stabilization and prolonged survival in a substantial proportion of progressive stage IV uveal melanoma patients, even following heavy chemotherapy treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0655-9 | DOI Listing |
Int J Cancer
January 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
The effectiveness and safety of combining anlotinib with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) have not been definitively established. This research seeks to investigate the potential benefits and risks of utilizing this combination therapy in the first-line management of R/M NPC. The research involved 22 individuals diagnosed with R/M NPC and who had not undergone any previous treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Chemother Pharmacol
January 2025
Clinical Pharmacology & Quantitative Pharmacology, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, USA.
Purpose: Durvalumab in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin has shown a favorable benefit-risk profile in the TOPAZ-1 study for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC). This analysis evaluated the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) of durvalumab, and exposure-response for efficacy and safety (ERES) of TOPAZ-1.
Methods: The PopPK model for durvalumab was updated using data from 5 previously analysed studies and TOPAZ-1.
World J Gastrointest Oncol
January 2025
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China.
Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common and aggressive subtype of biliary tract cancer (BTC) and has a poor prognosis. A newly developed regimen of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and durvalumab shows promise for the treatment of advanced BTC. However, the efficacy of this treatment for GBC remains unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Department of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
MicroRNA (miRNA) dysregulation has been identified in several carcinomas, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and is known to play a role in the development and progression of this disease. We initially conducted a miRNA microarray analysis, which revealed that the MNK inhibitor CGP57380 increased the expression of miR-150-3p. A similar analysis was performed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWe seek to establish a parsimonious mathematical framework for understanding the interaction and dynamics of the response of pancreatic cancer to the NGC triple chemotherapy regimen (mNab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin), stromal-targeting drugs (calcipotriol and losartan), and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-L1). We developed a set of ordinary differential equations describing changes in tumor size (growth and regression) under the influence of five cocktails of treatments. Model calibration relies on three tumor volume measurements obtained over a 14-day period in a genetically engineered pancreatic cancer model (KrasLSLG12D-Trp53LSLR172H-Pdx1-Cre).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!