Background: Evaluation of the cervical spine (c-spine) in obtunded severely injured trauma patients is controversial, and spine immobilization is frequently prolonged. We examined the effect of two different c-spine evaluation protocols on c-spine immobilization and clinical outcomes.
Methods: We prospectively evaluated consecutive intubated and mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a Level I academic trauma center with a diagnosis of multiple blunt injuries who had normal findings on high-resolution helical computed tomogram of C1 to T1 with reconstructions (HCTrecon). From July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2005 (n = 140), the findings of HCTrecon and either clinical examination or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were required to be normal to discontinue c-spine immobilization (clinical/MRI protocol). From July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006 (n = 75), the policy was changed to require normal finding only on HCTrecon to discontinue c-spine immobilization (HCTrecon protocol).
Results: Patients evaluated by the clinical/MRI and HCTrecon protocols had similar baseline characteristics. Compared with clinical/MRI patients, HCTrecon patients had their c-spines immobilized for fewer days (median, 6 days vs. 2 days; p < 0.001), were less likely to experience a complication of c-spine immobilization (64% vs. 37%, p = 0.010), required shorter periods of mechanical ventilation (median, 4 days vs. 3 days; p = 0.011), and had shorter stays in the ICU (median, 6 days vs. 4 days; p = 0.028) and hospital (median, 16 days vs. 14 days; p = 0.043). There was no difference in hospital mortality (13% vs. 16%, p = 0.920) and no missed c-spine injuries in either group.
Conclusion: Discontinuation of c-spine precautions based on the normal findings of HCTrecon decreases the duration of c-spine immobilization in obtunded severely injured patients and is associated with fewer complications, fewer days of mechanical ventilation, and shorter stays in the ICU and hospital.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318076b537 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Management of Cervical Spine Fractures and Injuries: A Literature Review.
Cureus
December 2024
Emergency Medicine, West Midlands Deanery, Birmingham, GBR.
Cervical spine injuries are one of the most common injuries of the spine that are encountered in the emergency department (ED). More than half of all spinal injuries presenting to the ED involve the cervical spine, with nearly half of them resulting from road traffic accidents. The majority of spinal cord injuries are found to occur in males of younger age groups, with almost half of them resulting in incomplete spinal cord injuries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of Intubating Conditions Between Direct Laryngoscopy and C-MAC Video-laryngoscopy in Patients With Simulated Cervical Spine Immobilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol
January 2025
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine & Critical Care, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Center.
Intubation of patients requiring cervical spine immobilization can be challenging. Recently, the use of C-MAC video laryngoscopes (VL) has increased in popularity over direct laryngoscopy (DL). We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of C-MAC VL as compared with DL for intubation in C-spine immobilized patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIncidence of cervical spine injury in victims of dismounted blast: a systematic review.
BMJ Mil Health
November 2024
Centre for Injury Studies, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Introduction: Dismounted blast has the potential to cause life-threatening injuries to multiple simultaneous casualties, including injury to the cervical spine (c-spine). Spinal immobilisation can be costly in terms of time and personnel required to apply and sustain it. C-spine 'clearing' tools frequently do not apply to the blast-injured casualty, so clinical judgement must be used to determine those requiring c-spine immobilisation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatric C-spine Clearance by CT: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Cureus
August 2024
Department of Surgery, Sanford Medical Center, Fargo, USA.
Background: Pediatric cervical spinal injury (CSI) remains a significant concern following blunt trauma, with mortality rates as high as 48%. Current protocols involve cervical immobilization and clearance through multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans, followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or clinical examination. However, prolonged collar use poses risks, necessitating timely clearance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLack of Association between Cervical Spine Injuries and Prehospital Immobilization: From Tradition to Evidence.
J Clin Med
August 2024
Medical Corps, Israel Defense Force, Tel HaShomer, Tel Aviv 5510802, Israel.
Article Synopsis
- Cervical spine (C-spine) trauma is often caused by blunt injuries, typically managed with prehospital spinal immobilization using a cervical collar, but the effectiveness of this method is unclear.
- A study analyzed data from 220 blunt trauma patients treated by Israeli Defense Force medical teams, finding that only 8% had actual C-spine injuries and that cervical collars were not linked to better outcomes.
- The use of cervical collars was more related to other factors like backboard immobilization and oxygen use, highlighting the need for clear clinical guidelines for medical providers dealing with C-spine injuries.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!