Mlc and NagC are two homologous transcription factors which bind to similar DNA targets but for which the inducing signals and mechanisms of activation are very different. Displacing Mlc from its DNA binding sites necessitates its sequestration to the inner membrane via an interaction with PtsG (EIICB(Glc)), while NagC is displaced from its DNA targets by interacting with GlcNAc6P. We have isolated mutations in both proteins which prevent the inactivation of the repressors by growth on glucose or GlcNAc. These mutations are located in different and specific regions of each protein. For Mlc changes at the C-terminal make it a constitutive repressor and also prevent it from binding to EIIB(Glc). Mutations in NagC, at positions which form a structural motif resembling a glucose binding site in Mlc, produce permanently repressing forms of NagC, suggesting that this motif forms a GlcNAc6P binding site in NagC. The pattern of repression by chimeric proteins of NagC and Mlc confirms the importance of the C-terminal region of Mlc for both repression and inducer binding and demonstrate that the helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif is not sufficient to determine the specificity of interaction of the repressor with DNA.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06041.x | DOI Listing |
Microbiology (Reading)
July 2019
UMR8261,CNRS, Université de Paris, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 13, rue P. et M. Curie, 75005 Paris, France.
NagC is a transcription factor that represses genes involved in N-acetylglucosamine catabolism in Escherichia coli. Repression by NagC is relieved by interaction with GlcNAc6P, the product of transport of GlcNAc into the cell. The DNA-binding domain of NagC contains a classic helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif, but specific operator recognition requires, in addition, an adjacent linker sequence, which is thought to form an extended wing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMicrobiology (Reading)
August 2015
Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 13 rue P. et M. Curie, 75005 Paris, France.
The Mlc transcription factor in Escherichia coli controls the expression of the phosphotransferase system genes implicated in the transport of glucose into the cell. Transport of glucose derepresses Mlc-repressed genes by provoking the sequestration of Mlc to the membrane, via an interaction with the dephosphorylated EIIB domain of the glucose transporter, PtsG. NagC, a paralogue of Mlc in E.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNucleic Acids Res
January 2015
CNRS-FRE3630 (ex UPR9073), Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 13 rue P. et M. Curie, 75005 Paris, France
NagC and Mlc, paralogous members of the ROK family of proteins with almost identical helix-turn-helix DNA binding motifs, specifically regulate genes for transport and utilization of N-acetylglucosamine and glucose. We previously showed that two amino acids in a linker region outside the canonical helix-turn-helix motif are responsible for Mlc site specificity. In this work we identify four amino acids in the linker, which are required for recognition of NagC targets.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Microbiol
September 2012
UPR9073 CNRS (associated with Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité), Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 13, Rue P. et M. Curie, 75005, Paris, France.
Protein-DNA recognition is fundamental to transcriptional regulation. Transcription factors must be capable of locating their specific sites situated throughout the genome and distinguishing them from related sites. Mlc and NagC control uptake and use of the sugars, glucose and N-acetylglucosamine.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Bacteriol
July 2008
Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, UPR9073-CNRS, 13 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France.
The Mlc and NagC transcriptional repressors bind to similar 23-bp operators. The sequences are weakly palindromic, with just four positions totally conserved. There is no cross regulation observed between the repressors in vivo, but there are no obvious bases which could be responsible for operator site discrimination.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!