The dual-use dilemma arises in the context of research in the biological and other sciences as a consequence of the fact that one and the same piece of scientific research sometimes has the potential to be used for bad as well as good purposes. It is an ethical dilemma since it is about promoting good in the context of the potential for also causing harm, e.g., the promotion of health in the context of providing the wherewithal for the killing of innocents. It is an ethical dilemma for the researcher because of the potential actions of others, e.g., malevolent non-researchers who might steal dangerous biological agents, or make use of the original researcher's work. And it is a dilemma for governments concerned with the security of their citizens, as well as their health. In this article we construct a taxonomy of types of "experiments of concern" in the biological sciences, and thereby map the terrain of ethical risk. We then provide a series of analyses of the ethical problems and considerations at issue in the dual-use dilemma, including the impermissibility of certain kinds of research and possible restrictions on dissemination of research results given the risks to health and security. Finally, we explore the main available institutional responses to some of the specific ethical problems posed by the dual-use dilemma in the biological sciences.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7089176 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9043-4 | DOI Listing |
Metallomics
December 2024
Molecular Microbiology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Cupriavidus metallidurans is able to thrive in metal-rich environments but also survives metal starvation. Expression of metal resistance determinants in C. metallidurans was investigated on a global scale.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Bioeth Inq
July 2024
University of Tübingen, Ethics of Genome Editing Research Unit, Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, Gartenstr. 47, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Contemporary genome editing techniques have made genomic intervention-from microorganism to human-more accessible, easier to use, and more accurate than previous methods. We argue that, notwithstanding its merits in treating and preventing disease in humans, genome editing represents a potential threat for domestic and international security, requiring an integrated approach in regulating, detecting, preventing, and mitigating the risk of its use for malicious purposes. Despite the global regulatory ambitions of the 2021 WHO framework, we see insufficient attention given to the future prospect of dual-use genomic technology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Exp Med Biol
May 2024
Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Historically, biological agents have been used to target various populations. One of the earliest examples could be the catastrophic effect of smallpox in Australia in the eighteenth century (as alleged by some historians). Modern biological techniques can be used to both create or provide protection against various agents of biological warfare.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Clin Pharmacol
March 2024
Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Front Mol Biosci
May 2022
Department of Nanobiotechnology, Institute for Synthetic Bioarchitectures, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!