Background: Limited information is available about clinical outcomes following routine percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the current era. This study aimed to identify predictors of adverse clinical or angiographic complications following PCI in patients from many different countries.
Methods: RIVIERA is a multinational, prospective, observational study in patients undergoing elective or primary PCI. Consecutive patients (n=7962) were enrolled in 144 hospitals from 23 countries in four different continents. Primary outcome was death or myocardial infarction (MI). The mean age of the patients was 59 years and 77% were men; 92% of patients underwent elective and 8% primary PCI.
Results: The rate of in-hospital outcomes was low: death 0.3%, MI 1%, any bleeding 3.4%. Angiographic complications occurred in 8.7% of patients, mainly coronary dissection (3.7%) and no reflow (2%). After multivariable analysis, the strongest independent predictors of death or MI were clinical presentation with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and administration of a glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Radial access, thienopyridine pretreatment and anticoagulation with enoxaparin were associated with a lower risk of death or MI. Female gender, PCI of coronary artery bypass graft, administration of a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and combined use of enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin were significantly associated with more bleeding. Radial access was the only variable associated with less bleeding.
Conclusions: Routine PCI appears to be a relatively safe revascularization procedure. Many of the variables identified as predictors of adverse cardiac outcomes confirm results obtained in recent randomized PCI trials and are modifiable, suggesting that further improvements can be made.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.07.127 | DOI Listing |
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Objective: We aim to explore the differences in complication rates in endoscopic versus open transcervical treatment of Zenker diverticulum.
Study Design: Retrospective Cohort Study from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2023.
Setting: Queries of the TriNetX database's United States Collaborative Network.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Objective: Information technologies may enhance our traditional perioperative teaching by providing more comprehensive information beyond the clinical visit. This quality improvement study aims to assess whether the implementation of an animated surgical video improves caregiver satisfaction for children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.
Study Design: Prospective, single-blinded randomized-controlled trial was conducted between March 1 and October 1, 2023.
Neuroradiol J
January 2025
Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Objective: Predicting treatment response in patients with vestibular schwannomas (VSs) remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the use of pre-treatment normalized apparent diffusion coefficient (nADC) values and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics in predicting treatment outcomes in patients with VSs undergoing radiosurgery.
Methods: The MR images of 44 patients with VSs who underwent radiosurgery at our institution were retrospectively reviewed, and the patients were categorized into tumor control ( = 28) and progression ( = 16) groups based on treatment response after treatment initiation, with a median follow-up duration of 29.
Int J Surg
January 2025
Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Background: The inclusion of clinical frailty in the assessment of patients planned for major surgery has proven to be an independent predictor of outcome. Since approximately half of all patients in the UK diagnosed with oesophagogastric (OG) cancer are over 75 years of age, assessment of frailty may be important in selection for surgery.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study applied the Hospital Frailty Risk Score to data obtained from the NHS Secondary Uses Service electronic database for patients aged 75 years or older undergoing oesophagectomy and gastrectomy between April 2017 and March 2020.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!